ICD: a qualitative study of patient experience the first year after implantation.

J Clin Nurs

Research Group Psychology of Health and Illness, and Heart Lung Institute, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Published: November 2004

AI Article Synopsis

  • A qualitative study was conducted to understand the experiences of patients living with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) during the first year after implantation.
  • Interviews with 21 patients were analyzed to identify major themes including physical changes, cognitive effects, social support, and anxiety related to the device.
  • Over time, patients reported improvements in well-being, focusing initially on recovery and later reflecting on their life changes and the impact of their cardiac arrest.

Article Abstract

Background: The experiences of how patients live with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator are still poorly understood. Only a few qualitative studies have investigated this phenomenon. This paper was undertaken as part of a larger project to evaluate quality of life and psychological well-being in those survivors of cardiac arrest who have received an implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

Aims And Objectives: The aim of this qualitative study was to explore how implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients perceive their lives during the first year after implantation of the device.

Methods: A sample of 21 patients who received an implantable cardioverter defibrillator was interviewed during three consecutive periods: one, six and 12 months postdischarge from the hospital. The semi-structured interviews were based on insights gained from a literature review. The transcripts were subjected to content analysis.

Results: Analysis of the data revealed seven major categories: physical deterioration, cognitive changes, perceived social support, dependency, contact with the doctor, confrontation with mortality and uncertainty surrounding having a shock. Anxiety, uncertainty, disappointment, frustration, unexpected barriers, acceptance of and dependency on the implantable cardioverter defibrillator played a major role in the lives of implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients. Well-being improved throughout the year. During the first months after discharge from the hospital the focus was on regaining physical health. During the early postimplantation period both the implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipient and family members had adapted to the situation. Reflection on the impact and consequences of the cardiac arrest was reported more often in the late postimplantation period.

Conclusions: Content analysis is a resourceful approach giving answers to questions that have hardly been addressed within the domain of cardiology. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients face a complex first year, especially the first 6 months. Cognitive deterioration and confrontation with mortality are problems that need to be researched further.

Relevance To Clinical Practice: Caregivers are able to explain to future patients what they can expect in the first year after implantation. Caregivers may become more receptive to physical, psychological and social limitations and to emotional and social problems that occur in implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients, enabling them to act upon them.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.01021.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

implantable cardioverter
36
cardioverter defibrillator
32
defibrillator recipients
16
year implantation
12
implantable
9
cardioverter
9
qualitative study
8
defibrillator
8
cardiac arrest
8
received implantable
8

Similar Publications

Aims: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is guideline recommended for the treatment of symptomatic heart failure (HF) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and prolonged QRS. However, patients with common comorbidities, such as persistent/permanent atrial fibrillation (AF), are often under-represented in clinical trials.

Methods: The Strategic Management to Optimize Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (SMART) registry (NCT03075215) was a global, multicentre, registry that enrolled de novo CRT implants, or upgrade from pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator to CRT-defibrillator (CRT-D), using a quadripolar left ventricular lead in real-world clinical practice.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The benefits of permanent cardiac pacing have been widely demonstrated. However, the literature on complications remains inconsistent. We lack precise information about the frequency of complications and their predictive factors in our center.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Cardiac implantable devices (CIED) such as pacemakers, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, or cardiac resynchronization devices are implanted in selected patients with bradyarrhythmia and advanced heart failure. The invasive character of these procedures poses a risk of early complications such as pneumothorax, bleeding, infections, or dislocations.

Aims: There are no available data that analyzed the impact of the organization of procedures on the early complications risk after permanent pacing procedures.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Among patients with structural heart disease with ventricular tachycardia (VT) refractory to medical therapy and catheter ablation, cardiac stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a paradigm-changing treatment option.

Aims: To assess the efficacy of cardiac SBRT in refractory VT by comparing the rates of VT episodes, anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) therapies, and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks post-SBRT with pre-SBRT.

Methods: We performed a comprehensive literature search and included all clinical studies reporting outcomes on cardiac SBRT for VT.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: The association of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED), namely pacemaker (PM), implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization therapy with (CRT-D) or without defibrillator (CRT-P) with health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is lacking.

Methods And Results: Data from the Swedish Pacemaker and ICD Registry collected from January 2019 to February 2022 was used to analyze the responses to the European Quality of Life-5 Dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) before and after one year of the CIED implant. Descriptive analysis was performed using Pearson's chi-square test, the analysis of variance ANOVA, the Kruskal-Wallis test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test when appropriate.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!