A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The length of unsutured mucosal margins in external dacryocystorhinostomy. | LitMetric

The length of unsutured mucosal margins in external dacryocystorhinostomy.

Am J Ophthalmol

Orbital Center, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Published: November 2004

Purpose: To compare the extent of mucosal margins remaining unsutured at the end of external dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) using single or double flap techniques and to evaluate the influence on outcome.

Design: Prospective, consecutive case series.

Methods: The number and length of mucosal margins remaining unsutured at the end of external DCR were evaluated in 64 patients. Mucosal anastomosis was performed using either a conservative (group 1) or extended (group 2) double flap, or a single flap (group 3) dissection. Patients were selected for group 1 if the regional anatomy permitted the desired dissection. All other patients were randomized to group 2 or 3. The mean length of unsutured mucosal margins was calculated for each group. Subjects were followed up to 12 months, with final success rate recorded.

Results: In groups 1, 2, and 3 respectively: 11, 24 and 29 patients were recruited; four, 12, and 10 mucosal margins remained unsutured; and the mean length of unsutured mucosal margins was 16.36 mm (SD = 2.8), 70.66 mm (SD = 9.3), and 62.00 mm (SD = 6.0). The mean length of unsutured mucosal margins was significantly different, although groups 1 and 2 collectively did not have a significantly different mean length of unsutured mucosal margin from group 3. Mean follow-up was 11 months (SD = 2.2), 63 patients (98.43%) had a successful outcome with no significant difference among groups (P = .429).

Conclusion: Different patterns of mucosal dissection in external DCR create a different number and extent of unsutured mucosal margins which do not appear to adversely affect the success rate of external DCR.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2004.06.032DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mucosal margins
32
unsutured mucosal
24
length unsutured
20
external dcr
12
mucosal
11
margins
8
external dacryocystorhinostomy
8
margins remaining
8
unsutured
8
remaining unsutured
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!