Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Purpose: To compare the extent of mucosal margins remaining unsutured at the end of external dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) using single or double flap techniques and to evaluate the influence on outcome.
Design: Prospective, consecutive case series.
Methods: The number and length of mucosal margins remaining unsutured at the end of external DCR were evaluated in 64 patients. Mucosal anastomosis was performed using either a conservative (group 1) or extended (group 2) double flap, or a single flap (group 3) dissection. Patients were selected for group 1 if the regional anatomy permitted the desired dissection. All other patients were randomized to group 2 or 3. The mean length of unsutured mucosal margins was calculated for each group. Subjects were followed up to 12 months, with final success rate recorded.
Results: In groups 1, 2, and 3 respectively: 11, 24 and 29 patients were recruited; four, 12, and 10 mucosal margins remained unsutured; and the mean length of unsutured mucosal margins was 16.36 mm (SD = 2.8), 70.66 mm (SD = 9.3), and 62.00 mm (SD = 6.0). The mean length of unsutured mucosal margins was significantly different, although groups 1 and 2 collectively did not have a significantly different mean length of unsutured mucosal margin from group 3. Mean follow-up was 11 months (SD = 2.2), 63 patients (98.43%) had a successful outcome with no significant difference among groups (P = .429).
Conclusion: Different patterns of mucosal dissection in external DCR create a different number and extent of unsutured mucosal margins which do not appear to adversely affect the success rate of external DCR.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2004.06.032 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!