Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Over the past decade, the financial pressures from variations in reimbursement and payer mix, combined with rapidly evolving technology, has forced healthcare institutions in the United States to seek out further options for cost savings. In the arena of interventional cardiology, the ability to successfully negotiate the lowest possible cost for a relatively small number of high-cost devices can result in significant savings. Historically, competitive bidding with market-share guarantee to a preferred vendor or two initially resulted in moderate cost savings. However, in 2003 our institution embarked on a novel approach in which we defined the price to be paid, and we challenged our vendors to meet that price. Early results of this aggressive strategy suggest that it is a successful technique in reducing supply costs and maintaining collaborative relationships with vendors while remaining fair and competitive.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!