Bioequivalence study of clopidogrel bisulfate film-coated tablets.

Arzneimittelforschung

SFBC Anapharm, Sainte-Foy, Quebec, Canada.

Published: September 2004

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of two clopidogrel (CAS 120202-66-6) formulations. The study was performed according to an open, cross-over design in one study center in 36 healthy male and female volunteers, comparing a new generic product (tablets containing clopidogrel bisulfate, 75 mg) with the originator product (reference). In each of the two study periods (separated by a wash-out of 7 days) a single dose of 150 mg (test or reference) was administered. Blood samples were taken up to 48 h post dose, the plasma was separated and the concentrations of clopidogrel were determined by an LC/MS/MS method. AUC0-inf, AUC0-t, Cmax, Tmax and T(1/2 el) were calculated for both formulations. The mean AUC0-inf, AUC0-t and Cmax were 29.94 ng x h/mL, 29.53 ng x h/mL and 7.386 ng/mL, respectively, for the test formulation and 29.24 ng x h/mL, 28.83 ng x h/mL and 7.921 ng/mL, respectively, for the reference formulation. The median Tmax for both formulations was 1.25 h. The point estimators of the ratios test/reference formulation for AUC0-inf, AUC0-t and Cmax were 101.17%, 101.13% and 90.96%, respectively. Furthermore, the 90% geometric confidence intervals of the mean ratio of In-transformed AUC0-inf and AUC0-t were narrow and symmetrical around 100%, i.e. from 96.38% to 106.21% for AUC0-inf and from 96.20% to 106.30% for AUC0-t, whereas the confidence interval for Cmax was 84.07% to 98.41%. In can be concluded that the two clopidogrel formulations (test formulation of clopidogrel bisulfate and reference formulation) are bioequivalent in terms of the rate and extent of absorption.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1297056DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

auc0-inf auc0-t
16
clopidogrel bisulfate
12
auc0-t cmax
12
test formulation
8
reference formulation
8
clopidogrel
6
auc0-inf
5
auc0-t
5
formulation
5
bioequivalence study
4

Similar Publications

[Comparative clinical study of pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of Relonova and Maxalt].

Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova

September 2023

LLC «NovaMedica», Moscow, Russia.

Objective: Evaluation of the bioequivalence of the tested Relonova, tablets, 10 mg and Maxalt, tablets, 10 mg drugs on an empty stomach in healthy volunteers.

Material And Methods: The pharmacokinetic analysis population included 40 volunteers, the safety analysis population included 40 volunteers. The average age of randomized volunteers (men - 20, women - 20) was 29.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Infections caused by multi-drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) are an emerging problem globally. Colistin is the last-sort antibiotic for MDR-GNB, but its toxicity limits its clinical use. We aimed to test the efficacy of colistin-loaded micelles (CCM-CL) against drug-resistant and compare their safety with that of free colistin in vitro and in vivo.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - This study examined the pharmacokinetic (PK) similarity, safety, and immunogenicity of AVT04, a potential biosimilar to the reference product ustekinumab (Stelara®).
  • - A total of 298 healthy subjects received either AVT04 or the reference products; results showed that the PK parameters met the predetermined bioequivalence criteria, indicating similarity.
  • - The findings also revealed that AVT04 had comparable safety and immunogenicity profiles to the reference products, supporting its potential use as a biosimilar.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To compare the rate and extent of absorption of a launched generic calcium dobesilate capsule versus the branded reference formulation under fasting and fed conditions in healthy Chinese subjects, and to assess their bioequivalence and tolerability.

Methods: This single-dose, open-label, randomized-sequence, 2-period crossover bioequivalence study was conducted on healthy Chinese volunteers aged 18 to 45 years. Subjects received a single 0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: In this review, we provide an updated assessment of available evidence on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of cannabidiol (CBD) and explore the impact of different factors on PK outcomes.

Materials And Methods: This systematic review and meta-regression analysis was pre-registered (PROSPERO: CRD42021269857). We systematically searched Medline, Embase, PsychInfo, and Web of Science Core Collection up to November 19, 2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!