Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the macular pigment optical density (MPOD) in a group of Chinese subjects using a simple customized light emitting diode-based device.
Methods: Heterochromatic flicker photometry was used in this study. With a 1 degrees diameter circular test stimulus, MPOD was estimated by comparing the relative sensitivities to a blue light, against a green reference, between foveal and parafoveal 4 degrees temporal locations. Fixed alternating frequencies were used. Repeatability was determined on a small group of subjects. A further group of 67 young healthy subjects provided data for MPOD norms.
Results: All results were corrected to the common MPOD reference wavelength of 460 nm. The group-averaged MPOD was 0.48 (S.D. 0.23). We found no gender difference in MPOD. The coefficient of variability was 7.2-8.0% and the coefficient of repeatability was 0.12.
Conclusions: The MPOD of Chinese subjects did not differ greatly from the reported MPOD in white subjects.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.2004.00242.x | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!