Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1732617 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech.2003.016972 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Rear passenger restraint in frontal NCAP tests compared to the right-front passenger.
Traffic Inj Prev
November 2024
ProBiomechanics LLC, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan.
Objective: This study compared kinematic and biomechanic responses of the 5 female Hybrid III in the right-rear and right-front passenger seats in frontal NCAP tests with 2015-16 MY vehicles. It focused on the lap-shoulder belt restraint of the rear passenger.
Methods: Eleven frontal NCAP tests were conducted by NHTSA at 56 km/h with a lap-shoulder belted 5 Hybrid III dummy in the right-rear and right-front seats.
Evaluation of Child Anthropometries in Relation to Modern Vehicle Seat and Booster Dimensions.
Stapp Car Crash J
October 2024
Injury Biomechanics Research Center, The Ohio State University.
This study compared modern vehicle and booster geometries with relevant child anthropometries. Vehicle geometries (seat length, seat pan height, shoulder belt outlet height, and roof height) were obtained for 275 center and outboard rear seating positions of US vehicles (MY 2009-2022). Measurements of 85 US boosters (pan height and pan length) and anthropometries of 80 US children between 4-14yo (seated height, thigh length, leg length, and seated shoulder height) were also collected.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThoracic Responses and Injuries of Male Post-Mortem Human Subjects in a Homogeneous Rear-Facing Seat During High-Speed Frontal Impact.
Ann Biomed Eng
November 2024
Injury Biomechanics Research Center, The Ohio State University, 333 West 10th Ave, RM2063, Columbus, Ohio, 43210, USA.
In recent post-mortem human subjects (PMHS) studies in a high-speed rear-facing frontal impact (HSRFFI), the PMHS sustained multiple rib fractures. The seatback structure and properties of the seats might contribute to these fractures. This study aimed to determine if a homogeneous rear-facing seat with foam-covered seatback would mitigate the risk of thoracic injury during an HSRFFI.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEffects of seatback angle, seat rotation, and impact speed on injury risk of occupants in highly automated vehicles in frontal crashes.
Traffic Inj Prev
November 2024
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Objective: The objective of this study is to examine the effects of seatback angle, seat rotation, and impact speed on occupant kinematics and injury risk in highly automated vehicles.
Methods: The study utilized the Global Human Body Models Consortium midsize male (M50-OS+B) simplified occupant model in a simplified vehicle model (SVM) to simulate frontal crashes. The M50-OS+B model was gravity-settled and belted into the driver and left rear passenger seat.
Interactions between rearward-facing child restraint systems and the center console in frontal impact sled tests.
Traffic Inj Prev
November 2024
Center for Injury Research and Prevention, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania.
Objective: To quantify the head and chest injury metrics associated with a pediatric anthropomorphic test device (ATD) in rearward-facing infant child restraint system (CRS) models positioned directly behind a center console during frontal impact sled tests.
Methods: Sled tests using the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 213 frontal crash pulse were performed. The test buck comprised a second row middle seat and center console from the same 2023 model mid-size SUV spaced as per the in-vehicle relative dimensions, a force plate covered with an automotive floor mat, a post-mounted shoulder belt simulating the in-vehicle roof-mounted seatbelt and an array of high-speed cameras.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!