Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
There have been divergent reports on the prevalence and severity of white matter hyperintensities (WMH) on brain magnetic resonance (MR) images in subjects with bipolar disorder. In the present study, evaluations were made on the prevalence and severity of WMH in subjects with bipolar disorder using contiguous 3-mm thick MR slices as well as fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images. A detailed WMH rating system was employed to assess these WMH. A total of 43 bipolar patients, as diagnosed by the Structured Clinical Interview from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-IV (SCID-IV), and 39 healthy comparison subjects were scanned using a 1.5-T whole body GE magnetic resonance scanner. WMH were assessed with a modified composite version of the Fazekas' and Coffey's rating scales to detect less severe WMH. Periventricular and subcortical WMH were coded separately. Subjects with bipolar disorder had greater prevalence of WMH abnormalities than comparison subjects (Bipolar, grade 1 = 11.6%, grade 2 = 9.3%, grade 3 = 7.0%; Comparison, grade 1 = 5.1%, grade 2 = 2.6%, grade 3 = 0%). This difference is mainly due to the differences in deep WMH (Bipolar, grade 1 = 14.0%, grade 2 = 14.0%; Comparison, grade 1 = 7.7%, grade 2 = 0%). The current study confirms the higher prevalence of WMH in subjects with bipolar disorder. Differences of small-sized WMH abnormalities between groups were successfully detected using a large number of bipolar subjects and thinner sliced MR images with FLAIR.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1819.2004.01294.x | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!