For the treatment of full-thickness articular cartilage lesions of the knee joint, as a result of trauma or osteochondritis dissecans, a variety of biological reconstruction techniques have been developed. Different studies, some of which were performed as randomised, prospective clinical studies, showed that the autologous chondrocyte transplantation (ACT) provides the most satisfying and reliable method of cartilage reconstruction in the adult when applied to defects exceeding 4 cm (2). Based on these results, ACT seems to be of economic benefit, as the risk of developing osteoarthritis correlates significantly with the size of the cartilage defect, when not treated properly and in time. Surveying the studies on basic scientific aspects of ACT, cartilage defect animal models and clinical studies, it can be concluded that clinical results of ACT depend on a variety of factors. In this review, published by the joined advisory board of the German Societies of Traumatology (DGU) and Orthopaedic Surgery (DGOOC), we summarize the current knowledge available and the state of the art concerning ACT. Especially we discuss the advantages of different procedures, methods for treating knee cartilage defects and factors that influence the outcome of the different treatment regimens, with the aim to develop guidelines for the correct indication and application of the ACT.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-832353 | DOI Listing |
Am J Sports Med
January 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Background: Osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA) is well established as a viable chondral restoration procedure for the treatment of symptomatic, focal chondral defects of the knee. The efficacy of secondary OCA in the setting of failed index cartilage repair or restoration is poorly understood.
Purpose: To evaluate radiographic and clinical outcomes, failures, and reoperations after OCA after failed index cartilage repair or restoration of the knee.
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil
December 2024
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sports Medicine & Shoulder Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A.
Purpose: To evaluate the relationship between preoperative whole-joint imaging evaluation of the knee with patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures after cartilage restoration surgery (mosaicplasty, osteochondral allograft transplantation, matrix autologous chondrocyte implantation).
Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent knee articular cartilage restoration at our institution from 2014 to 2020. The patients' knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was evaluated with the Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) and semiquantitative synovial inflammation imaging biomarkers of the preoperative MRI.
Pharmaceutics
December 2024
Laboratorio RAMSES, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via di Barbiano, 1/10, 40136 Bologna, Italy.
The treatment of articular cartilage damage has always represented a problem of considerable practical interest for orthopedics. Over the years, many surgical techniques have been proposed to induce the growth of repairing tissue and limit degeneration. In 1994, the turning point occurred: implanted autologous cells paved the way for a new treatment option based more on regeneration than repair.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Mol Sci
December 2024
Biomedical Engineering Program, Maroun Semaan Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, American University of Beirut, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon.
The limited self-repair capacity of cartilage due to its avascular and aneural nature leads to minimal regenerative ability. Autologous chondrocyte transplantation (ACT) is a popular treatment for cartilage defects but faces challenges due to chondrocyte dedifferentiation in later passages, which results in undesirable fibroblastic phenotypes. A promising treatment for cartilage injuries and diseases involves tissue engineering using cells (e.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Sports Med
January 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
Background: Failure of primary cartilage restoration procedures of the knee that proceed to necessitating revision cartilage procedures represent a challenging clinical scenario with variable outcomes reported in previous literature.
Purpose: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes and adverse events after revision cartilage restoration procedures of the knee for failed primary cartilage procedures.
Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!