Data are reported from 3,213 research eyewitnesses confirming that accurate eyewitness identifications from lineups are made faster than are inaccurate identifications. However, consistent with predictions from the recognition and search literatures, the authors did not find support for the "10-12-s rule" in which lineup identifications faster than 10-12 s maximally discriminate between accurate and inaccurate identifications (D. Dunning & S. Perretta, 2002). Instead, the time frame that proved most discriminating was highly variable across experiments, ranging from 5 s to 29 s, and the maximally discriminating time was often unimpressive in its ability to sort accurate from inaccurate identifications. The authors suggest several factors that are likely to moderate the 10-12-s rule.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.10.3.139DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

inaccurate identifications
12
accurate inaccurate
8
identifications
5
eyewitness identification
4
identification accuracy
4
accuracy response
4
response latency
4
latency unruly
4
unruly 10-12-second
4
10-12-second rule
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!