Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Presternally exiting peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheters have been described as advantageous compared to abdominally exiting catheters with regard to infection, wound healing, and other complications. Placement of such catheters has only been described with open surgical techniques and not by percutaneous means. In this article we describe 15 patients who received percutaneously placed PD catheters with a presternal exit site. These patients received their procedures in an outpatient procedure room performed by an interventional nephrologist. In all but one case, immediate technical success was achieved. In only one case was peritonitis documented. All catheters are still functional, including some with follow-up as long as 15 months. Percutaneous placement of presternally exiting PD catheters is technically straightforward and can avoid an open surgical procedure.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0894-0959.2004.17356.x | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!