Background: Although local recurrence of advanced esophageal cancer is frequent after definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT), the clinical benefit of salvage esophagectomy has not been elucidated.

Methods: We reviewed 27 patients with squamous-cell cancer who underwent esophagectomy after definitive CRT (> or = 50 Gy) (salvage group) and 28 patients who underwent planned esophagectomy after neoadjuvant CRT (30 to 45 Gy) (neoadjuvant group).

Results: The preoperative albumin level and vital capacity were significantly lower in the salvage group than in the neoadjuvant group. Two patients (7.4%) from the salvage group who underwent extended esophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy died of postoperative complications, but no deaths occurred after less-invasive surgery. There was no difference of overall postoperative survival between the salvage and neoadjuvant groups.

Conclusions: The outcome of salvage esophagectomy after definitive CRT was similar to that of planned esophagectomy after neoadjuvant CRT. Less-invasive procedures might be better for salvage esophagectomy because of the high operative risk.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.06.003DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

salvage esophagectomy
16
esophagectomy definitive
12
salvage group
12
salvage
8
advanced esophageal
8
esophageal cancer
8
definitive crt
8
group patients
8
planned esophagectomy
8
esophagectomy neoadjuvant
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!