A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Operative and non-operative treatment of benign subglottic laryngotracheal stenosis. | LitMetric

Operative and non-operative treatment of benign subglottic laryngotracheal stenosis.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg

University of Rome "La Sapienza", Division of Thoracic Surgery, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Via Grottarossa, 1035-1039, Rome 00189, Italy.

Published: October 2004

Objective: Surgery is the first line of treatment for laryngotracheal stenosis; Montgomery tube or permanent tracheostomy have been so far the only alternatives. Nd-YAG laser resection and indwelling endotracheal stents have rarely been used in subglottic stenosis for anatomic and technical reasons. We have used the latter approach to optimize the timing of surgery or to achieve palliation without tracheostomy.

Methods: Between 1991 and 2001 we have treated 18 patients with subglottic stenosis (10 males, 8 females; age range 14-78, mean 34). The upper margin of the stricture was 2mm to 1cm below the vocal cords; the stenotic segment extended from 1.5 to 5 cm. Three patients had tracheostomy done elsewhere. Four patients (Group I) had laser and stenting by a Dumon prosthesis as the only treatment; six had laser and stenting (#4) followed after 1-6 months by laryngotracheal resection (Group II); eight had surgery alone (Group III).

Results: In Group I, one patient required repositioning of the stent and in two the stent was removed; two patients died of their underlying disease; at a follow-up of 2-9 years all living patients did well but required permanent aerosolized therapy and periodical bronchoscopy. In Group II, we had two wound infections due to airway colonization by staphylococcus aureus. In Group III, two patients developed anastomotic postoperative stenosis, treated by laser (#2) and stenting (#1), and one patient with previous tracheostomy had a wound infection. Overall, in the 14 surgical patients (Groups II and III) stenosis occurred in 14.2% and infection in 21.3%. After a follow up of 15 months to 12 years, all surgical patients breathe and speak well.

Conclusions: Laser resection and endoluminal stenting can be a viable alternative to surgery or optimize the timing of operation in patients with subglottic stenosis.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.06.020DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

subglottic stenosis
12
laser stenting
12
patients
9
laryngotracheal stenosis
8
laser resection
8
optimize timing
8
patients subglottic
8
surgical patients
8
stenosis
7
group
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!