The purpose of this phase II trial was to compare the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of four irinotecan schedules for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. In total, 174 5-fluorouracil pretreated patients were randomised to: arm A (n=41), 350 mg m(-2) irinotecan as a 90-min i.v. infusion q3 weeks; arm B (n=38), 125 mg m(-2) irinotecan as a 90-min i.v. infusion weekly x 4 weeks q6 weeks; arm C (n=46), 250 mg m(-2) irinotecan as a 90-min i.v. infusion q2 weeks; or arm D (n=49), 10 mg m(-2) day(-1) irinotecan as a 14-day continuous infusion q3 weeks. No significant differences in efficacy across the four arms were observed, although a shorter time to treatment failure was noted for arm D (1.7 months; P=0.02). Overall response rates were in the range 5-11%. Secondary end points included median survival (6.4-9.4 months), and time to progression (2.7-3.8 months) and treatment failure (1.7-3.2 months). Similarly, there were no significant differences in the incidence of grade 3-4 toxicities, although the toxicity profile between arms A, B, and C and D did differ. Generally, significantly less haematologic toxicity, alopecia and cholinergic syndrome were observed in arm D; however, there was a trend for increased gastrointestinal toxicity. Irinotecan is an effective and safe second-line treatment for colorectal cancer. The schedules examined yielded equivalent results, indicating that there is no advantage of the prolonged vs short infusion schedules.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2409929PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602172DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

colorectal cancer
12
m-2 irinotecan
12
irinotecan 90-min
12
90-min infusion
12
infusion weeks
12
weeks arm
12
metastatic colorectal
8
treatment failure
8
irinotecan
7
arm
6

Similar Publications

With the rapid development of minimally invasive surgical techniques, there remains considerable controversy regarding the choice of surgical approach and anastomosis method for patients with right-sded colon cancer (RSCC). This meta-analysis compared the short-term outcomes of open right colectomies (ORC), laparoscopic right colectomies with intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis (LRC-IA and LRC-EA), as well as robot right colectomies with intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis (RRC-IA and RRC-EA). A systematic search was conducted across PubMed (n = 549), Web of Science (n = 821), Embase (n = 591), and the Cochrane Central Register (n = 86) from January 2000 to August 2024.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The feasibility of trials in liver surgery using a single-component clinical endpoint is low because single endpoints require large samples due to their low incidence. The current study sought to develop and validate a novel composite endpoint of liver surgery (CELS) to facilitate the generation of more feasible and robust high-level evidence in the field of liver surgery.

Methods: Patients who underwent curative-intent hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, or colorectal liver metastasis were identified using a multi-institutional database.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Guidelines for some pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) have shifted towards active surveillance given the indolent nature of this malignancy. We sought to assess the safety of delayed surgery on colorectal NETs as a surrogate for surveillance.

Methods: Resected, stage I, well-differentiated colorectal primary NETs included in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program from 2010 to 2020 were included.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks as the fourth most common cause of brain metastasis (BM), with its incidence on the rise. However, the molecular mechanisms driving the formation of these lesions from CRC remain unclear.

Methods: We analyzed the FoundationOne genomic database, which includes over 35,000 CRC samples from both local and metastatic sites.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms(GEP NEN) exhibit substantial biological heterogeneity, impacting clinical management and outcomes. In 2019, the WHO introduced the neuroendocrine tumour(NET) grade 3 (G3) subgroup, characterized by Ki-67>20% and a well-differentiated morphology and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas(NEC) (Ki-67>20%). Since this update, questions about the prognostic implications and best treatment strategies for NET G3 and NEC remain.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!