Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Amodiaquine (AQ) is currently a major candidate for new antimalarial combinations, although in vivo and in vitro tests have been rarely simultaneously investigated. The efficacy of AQ was assessed at the dose of 30 mg/kg in treating Plasmodium falciparum malaria attacks in 74 children from southeast Gabon, and the in vitro activity of monodesethylamodiaquine (MdAQ), the main metabolite of AQ, was measured against P. falciparum parasites isolated from these children. Treatment failures were observed in 40.5% of the children, while 5.4% of the isolates showed in vitro resistance to MdAQ. No relationship was observed between in vivo and in vitro susceptibility. The in vitro activities of MdAQ and chloroquine were correlated. The reasons for such disparities between in vivo and in vitro AQ activities are discussed and the issue of the validity of in vitro tests to measure AQ efficacy is raised.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!