A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Fall risk factors assessment tool: enhancing effectiveness in falls screening. | LitMetric

A quasi-experimental study was conducted to explore the effectiveness of fall prevention among hospital patients based on the modified fall risk factors assessment tool. We investigated the frequency of falls among hospital patients at a medical center in Taiwan. The experimental group of falls victims was selected from patients (n = 39) hospitalized in 2002 after falls. The control group of patients falls was selected by means of a retrospective incident report review which identified patients (n = 43) hospitalized one year earlier. The results showed that there was no significant difference in the incidence of falls between the two groups. Nevertheless, there were significant differences in age, indications of falls, use of sedatives, walking ability and evaluated grade of fall risk factors. In addition, the average level of satisfaction under recently modified fall risk factors evaluation guideline was 2.68 points (upper limit = 4 points) based upon investigation derived from nursing staff ' s opinions. Moreover, nursing staff from GYN/OBS and orthopedics departments acknowledged the enhanced effectiveness of these new guidelines. The screening rate for high-risk orthopedic patients was increased from 20.7 % to 41.9 %. Furthermore, the screening rate among the experimental group (74.4 % ) was also higher than that among the control group (60.5 % ) ( p <.01). In line with our effective tool to screen high-risk patients, we also added the concept of continuous quality improvement in nursing care to implement a fall prevention program to reduce unnecessary injury. This strategy may assist nursing personnel in providing immediate and individualized care as well as health education for high-risk patients. It may also cause the incidence of patient falls in hospitals to continue to decline.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.jnr.0000387501.32051.6fDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fall risk
16
risk factors
16
factors assessment
8
assessment tool
8
hospital patients
8
modified fall
8
experimental group
8
patients hospitalized
8
control group
8
nursing staff
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!