Objectives: To identify practitioners' demographic and professional characteristics associated with reporting of mandatory-reporting diseases (MRDs), and to identify attitudes associated with MRD reporting.
Design: Longitudinal study.
Setting: Regional Health Service of Galicia (North-western Spain).
Subjects: Random sample of 600 physicians.
Main Outcome Measures: A postal questionnaire was used to measure the physicians' beliefs, knowledge and attitudes regarding MRDs. Associations between the independent variables and outcomes (notification or non-notification of MRDs every week during 1998) were modelled using the Andersen-Gill proportional hazards model.
Results: The response rate was 60.1%. The following beliefs, knowledge and attitudes were statistically associated with a smaller probability of reporting any given MRD: (1) I would only notify an MRD after confirming diagnosis; (2) the MRD reporting system interferes with my daily clinical practice; (3) besides the legal requirements, I would have to report MRDs as a medical professional; and (4) only the reporting of relevant or severe MRDs is necessary. Under-reporting was not associated with specialization (general or paediatric) or the type of contract (fixed or temporary), but was associated with gender.
Conclusions: Some physicians' beliefs, knowledge and attitudes regarding MRDs are associated with under-reporting. This suggests that modification of certain attitudes and knowledge in physicians could greatly reduce the under-reporting of MRDs.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2003.12.015 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!