Purpose: Experimental phantom study for the detection of simulated lesions with five different digital and one conventional screen-film mammography system.

Materials And Methods: Three radiographs were obtained at various configurations of the phantom with one conventional screen-film system (Mammomat 3000 N) (Siemens), five digital systems (high resolution computed radiography system [Fuji/Siemens], one a-Si detector [GE Medical Systems], two a-Se detectors [Siemens; Hologic / Lorad] and one CCD detector [Fischer Imaging]), applying the same exposure parameters. The Wisconsin Mammographic Random Phantom, Model 152 A, was used. Five investigators with different experience in mammography (3 months to more than 4 years) evaluated the 18 randomly selected radiographs.

Results: No significant differences were found in the detection rate of simulated breast lesions for conventional screen-film mammography (84.9 %), high resolution computed radiography (86.7 %) and digital mammography with an a-Si detector (89.8 %). Highly significantly better results (p < 0.001) were found with the two a-Se systems (97.3 %) and the CCD system (100 %).

Conclusion: Conventional screen-film mammography can be replaced by high resolution computed radiography and digital mammography with a-Si-, a-Se- and CCD-detectors. This has to be confirmed in further clinical studies.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-813261DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

conventional screen-film
16
screen-film mammography
12
high resolution
12
resolution computed
12
computed radiography
12
study detection
8
detection simulated
8
simulated lesions
8
lesions digital
8
digital conventional
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!