Advance directives. Good, bad or indifferent.

Wien Klin Wochenschr

Department of Philosophy, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California 95817, USA.

Published: July 2004

AI Article Synopsis

Article Abstract

The author writes about various alternatives once decisional capacity is lost. So-called advance directives come in two forms: the living will and an appointed proxy for health care. The US--were these have been legally binding for over 20 years in all states--is a useful laboratory for studying the effect. Advantages and disadvantages are discussed. In some civilizations decisions about all such matters are made in different ways--these are not superior or inferior but simply different. In the US with its shameful social conditions for a large part of the population more important problems need to be addressed. In civilizations which have at least basic medical care for all, discussing such documents becomes far more important. The EU is likely to make some form of advance directive have legal standing. The last 20 or more years that they have been utilized in the US may provide experience important for the time when the EU also makes such documents legally binding.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03040927DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

advance directives
8
legally binding
8
directives good
4
good bad
4
bad indifferent
4
indifferent author
4
author writes
4
writes alternatives
4
alternatives decisional
4
decisional capacity
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!