Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Purpose: To determine the presence of bacterial biofilm on nylon sutures removed from clinically noninfected eyes after cataract surgery.
Setting: The Eye Institute, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Methods: Sutures were removed from 10 eyes after cataract surgery at different time periods. Immediately after removal, the sutures were fixed and dehydrated. All sutures were viewed by scanning electron microscopy, and 6 were also viewed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM).
Results: There was no evidence of bacterial biofilm formation on the nylon sutures. Significant cellular debris was seen, mainly at the knots. Clusters of coccoid-shaped structures were visible; however, examination by TEM showed they were not bacteria.
Conclusion: There was no evidence of biofilm formation on sutures removed after cataract surgery from clinically noninfected eyes.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.02.044 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!