A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Testing the biomechanical optimality of the wall thickness of limb bones in the red fox (Vulpes vulpes). | LitMetric

The optimum for the ratio K of the internal to external diameter of a marrow-filled tubular bone with minimum mass designed to withstand a given type of strength (yield/fatigue, stiffness, fracture or impact) depends on Q = rhom/rhob only, where rhom and rhob are the densities of marrow and bone. With computer-assisted evaluation of radiographs of 62 femurs in the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) we measured the values of K. The mean and standard deviation of K are 0.68 and 0.036, and K changes in the rather wide range from 0.59 to 0.74. Accepting the assumption of earlier authors that Q = 0.50 or 0.44, our data would support the hypothesis that the fox femurs are optimized to withstand yield, fatigue or stiffness strengths. However, since the Q-values are unknown, the possibility cannot be excluded that any studied fox bone with an appropriately selected Q-value is optimized for any strength type. Assuming Q = 0.50 or 0.44, the relative mass increments mu of the investigated fox bones are smaller than 5% under all four mechanical conditions. The evolutionary relevance of such tiny mu-values is questionable.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.01.008DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

red fox
8
fox vulpes
8
vulpes vulpes
8
050 044
8
fox
5
testing biomechanical
4
biomechanical optimality
4
optimality wall
4
wall thickness
4
thickness limb
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!