When a biological quantity examination exhibits a high degree of individuality, developing a strategy for interpreting these values in an individual context can be a useful alternative. Time-series analysis is the appropriate statistical framework to build a model for explanation of the behaviour of laboratory information and to forecast future values. The key concepts in this approach are autocorrelation and within-person variance. Unfortunately, the powerful tools provided by time-series analysis require many observations, a requisite difficult to meet in every day practice. However, introducing some restrictions in the autocorrelation parameter of the most reliable model, the first order autocorrelation model, and using the average within-person variance from a selected population, it is possible to build predictive reference intervals for an individual, based on only few observations. The most common case is the minimum time series: when there are just two observations. The statistical significance of the change from a previous observation is a problem that arises from both quality control (delta checks) and the interpretative diagnostic fields (reference change limit). Applying the same restrictive criteria, it is possible to develop specific limits for a difference between consecutive observations based on a within-person variance selected from the distribution of variances found in a sample of similar individuals.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2004.129 | DOI Listing |
J Child Psychol Psychiatry
December 2024
Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Background: Interpersonal outcomes and mental health problems are closely associated. However, their reciprocal influence has not been directly examined while considering the temporal stability of these constructs, as well as shared and unique variance associated with internalising, externalising and attention problems. Using random intercept cross-lagged panel models (RI-CLPM), we tested the hypotheses that negative bidirectional associations at the between-person and negative cross-lagged effects at the within-person level would emerge between interpersonal outcomes (friendship quality and perceived popularity) and mental health problems (i.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPLoS One
December 2024
Edna Bennett Pierce Prevention Research Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States of America.
J Pers Soc Psychol
November 2024
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis.
Stress experiences have been found to vary at both the interindividual and intraindividual levels. The present study investigated the concurrent and longitudinal associations between values and stress at both the between-person and the within-person levels. We considered multiple aspects of stress, including self-reported stressor exposure and perceived stress, as well as general and domain-specific stress.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Womens Health
November 2024
Division of Clinical Psychological Intervention, Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Schwendenerstraße 27, Berlin, 14195, Germany.
Background: Reproductive mood disorders indicate that within-person variation in depressive symptoms across the menstrual cycle can be related to ovarian hormone changes. Until now, such cycle-related symptom changes have been measured once daily, even though depression research indicates systematic diurnal changes in symptoms. Further, previous research often focused on aggregated depression scores.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!