Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
In his 1965 paper 'DNA content of tumours: cytophotometric measurements', Sandritter was for the first time able to relate tumour DNA content to the pathology and progression of a small number of tumours. In subsequent publications, these observations were extended to the progression of a much more comprehensive range of tumours. The interpretation of Sandritter's paper below follows the increasing sophistication of methodologies for tumour DNA content through the existing publications and evaluates the conclusions and hypotheses Sandritter proposed in the light of the contemporary account.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2004.01.043 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!