AI Article Synopsis

  • A study was done to see if teaching skills for resident doctors could be improved through a special training program.
  • The training included 13 hours of practice in small groups over 6 months where they learned how to teach and received feedback.
  • Results showed that the doctors who went through the training improved their teaching skills way more than those who didn’t get the training.

Article Abstract

Background: Although resident physicians often teach, few trials have tested interventions to improve residents' teaching skills. A pilot trial in 2001-2002 found that 13 trained resident teachers taught better than did untrained control residents.

Objective: To determine whether a longitudinal residents-as-teachers curriculum improves residents' teaching skills.

Design: Randomized, controlled trial from May 2001 to February 2002 (pilot trial) and March 2002 to April 2003.

Setting: 4 generalist residencies affiliated with an urban academic medical center.

Participants: 62 second-year residents: 23 in the 2001-2002 pilot trial and 39 more in 2002-2003; 27 of the 39 participants were medicine residents required to learn teaching skills.

Intervention: A 13-hour curriculum in which residents practiced teaching and received feedback during 1-hour small-group sessions taught twice monthly for 6 months.

Measurements: A 3.5-hour, 8-station, objective structured teaching examination that was enacted and rated by 50 medical students before and after the intervention. Two trained, blinded raters independently assessed each station (inter-rater reliability, 0.75).

Results: In the combined results for 2001-2003, the intervention group (n = 33) and control group (n = 29) were similar in sex, specialty, and academic performance. On a 1 to 5 Likert scale, intervention residents outscored controls on overall improvement score (post-test-pretest difference, 0.74 vs. 0.07; difference between intervention and control groups, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.55 to 0.81]; P < 0.001) by a magnitude of 2.8 standard deviations and on all 8 individual stations. The intervention residents improved 28.5% overall, whereas the scores of control residents did not increase significantly (2.7%). In 2002-2003, 19 intervention residents similarly outscored 19 controls (post-test-pretest difference, 0.83 vs. 0.14; difference between intervention and control groups, 0.69 [CI, 0.53 to 0.84]; P < 0.001). Twenty-seven medicine residents required to learn teaching skills achieved scores similar to those of volunteers.

Limitations: The study was conducted at a single institution. No "real life" assessment with which to compare the results of the objective structured teaching examination was available.

Conclusions: Generalist residents randomly assigned to receive a 13-hour longitudinal residents-as-teachers curriculum consistently showed improved teaching skills, as judged by medical student raters. Residents required to participate improved as much as volunteers did.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-141-4-200408170-00005DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

teaching skills
16
residents' teaching
12
pilot trial
12
residents required
12
intervention residents
12
residents
10
teaching
9
13-hour curriculum
8
improve residents'
8
longitudinal residents-as-teachers
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!