The etiology of rectal prolapse is unclear. Diagnosis is easy by local inspection. The ideal surgery would repair the prolapse, correct any functional problems such as incontinence or constipation, be minimally invasive and cost-effective, and result in minimal morbidity and recurrence. The best surgical repair remains controversial-whether by the transanal/perineal or abdominal approach-with or without resection and rectopexy. There are no prospective-randomized studies that convincingly answer the numerous questions. The best possible option today seems to be the abdominal/laparoscopic method with a resection rectopexy according to Frykman and Goldberg.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00104-004-0932-7 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Systematic literature review and meta-analysis of surgical treatment of complete rectal prolapse in male patients.
Tech Coloproctol
November 2024
Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, 2950 Cleveland Clinic Blvd., Weston, FL, 33331, USA.
Article Synopsis
- Rectal prolapse surgery outcomes were reviewed in predominantly male populations, examining factors like recurrence, complications, and bowel function.
- Eight studies involving 452 male patients showed that abdominal procedures had lower recurrence rates (6%) compared to perineal procedures (19.3%), but longer operative times.
- The best results for improving constipation and fecal incontinence were found after resection rectopexy and posterior mesh rectopexy, respectively.
Quality of Life, Functional Outcomes, and Recurrence After Resection Rectopexy Versus Ventral Mesh Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse Repair.
Dis Colon Rectum
January 2025
Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
Background: Resection rectopexy and ventral mesh rectopexy are widely accepted surgical options for the treatment of rectal prolapse; however, reports on long-term recurrence rates and functional outcomes are lacking.
Objective: We compared quality of life, long-term functional outcomes, and prolapse recurrence after resection rectopexy versus ventral mesh rectopexy.
Design: We retrospectively reviewed our prospectively collected rectal prolapse surgery database.
Collaborative Implementation of Robotic Surgery Into an Academic Pediatric Surgery Practice.
J Surg Res
October 2024
Department of Pediatric Surgery, Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee. Electronic address:
Article Synopsis
- Robotic surgery is transforming minimally invasive approaches, particularly benefiting pediatric surgeons through enhanced precision due to the small surgical areas involved.
- A unique collaboration between pediatric and adult robotic surgeons facilitated the integration of robotic surgery in an academic setting, evaluating its outcomes against traditional laparoscopic techniques.
- Results showed that robotic cholecystectomy (RC) is on par with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in key metrics like procedure duration and patient recovery, highlighting the feasibility and advantages of robotic surgery for pediatric patients.
On-demand robotics-The best of both worlds for robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery.
Surgery
November 2024
Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland. Electronic address:
A modular, combined use of robotic and laparoscopic platforms has been suggested to address challenges in optimal workspace utilization. The 3-arm on-demand open Dexter Robotic System was developed to combine the advantages of robot-assisted precision surgery in narrow spaces with the laparoscopic approach for frequent position changes in larger spaces. The system integrates 2 patient carts, a fully controllable endoscope arm, and a sterile surgeon open console, allowing for a rapid switch between robot-assisted surgery and laparoscopy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Obstructive defecation syndrome (ODS) is frequently associated with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and compromises the quality of life in affected patients. In cases conservative treatment fails surgical therapy is required.
Objectives: The video case study combines a laparoscopic resection rectopexy (RRP) with a mesh sacrocolpopexy (SCP) in an interdisciplinary surgical approach.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!