A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Determination of the depth of 50% of maximum ionization, I50, for electron beams by the divided difference method. | LitMetric

A new characterization of depth-ionization parameters for electron beams is empirically deduced from our data analysis based on the divided difference method (the DD method), which employs the numerical differential of an ionization curve. The important feature of the present method is that it does not necessarily require normalized percent depth-ionization (NPDI) data. The depth of 50% of maximum ionization, I50, which is an important parameter for electron beam dosimetry, can be deduced from the analysis of an unnormalized (or partial) depth-ionization (UDI) curve obtained over a short interval of depth. The values of I50 determined by the DD method are in agreement to within 0.1 mm for energies of 4, 6, and 9 MeV, compared with the ones determined by the TG-51 protocol method (or the conventional method), and the difference was 0.9 mm for 12 and 15 MeV. The dose at the reference depth, dref, calculated from I50 by the DD method, is found to be in agreement with TG-51 to within 0.1%. The field size dependence of the DD method using UDI data was studied for three field sizes: 6 x 6, 10 x 10, and 20 x 20 cm2. For all energies, the discrepancies of I50 as determined by both methods were 0.9 mm on average for the 6 x 6 cm2 fields and 0.6 mm for the other two field sizes. This dependence was remarkable for 6 x 6 cm2 fields for 12 and 15 MeV, and the discrepancies shown by the DD method were 1.2 mm for 12 MeV and 1.8 mm for 15 MeV, respectively. Since the reference field size in clinical dosimetry is usually 10 x 10 cm2, this dependence will not affect clinical dosimetry. The DD method could be an alternative option for checking beam quality in dose calibration.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.1759799DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

method
11
depth 50%
8
50% maximum
8
maximum ionization
8
ionization i50
8
electron beams
8
divided difference
8
difference method
8
i50 determined
8
method agreement
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!