Objective: Children with isolated hearing impairment who have received cochlear implant at the optimal age mostly achieve remarkable results that are assessed by objective speech perception and production measurements. Different outcomes may be expected in case of conditions which may have a negative impact on postoperative performance. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of potentially limiting factors on postimplant outcomes.
Methods: Four groups of examinees (11 in total) were involved by the study: (A) four children with additional disabilities, (B) three children with cochlear malformation and/or ossification, (C) three reimplanted children, (D) a child with retrocochlear (cochlear nerve) pathology. Hearing, speech perception and production were examined by pure tone audiogram, speech audiogram, categories of auditory performance, speech intelligibility rating, listening progress profile, and monosyllabic trochee polysyllable test. Postoperative positive life changes were assessed by a questionnaire.
Results: Group A: perception skills better than expected, less satisfactory speech development. Group B: good sound perception, poor understanding. Group C: after reimplantation undisturbed conditions for continuation of optimal rehabilitation course. Group D: unsatisfactory results of pure tone hearing as well as speech perception and production.
Conclusion: In spite of unfavourable conditions all examinees, except a child with retrocochlear pathology, were found to have a considerable benefit after cochlear implantation (with regard to obvious heterogeneity within each group). Evaluation of success, especially in children with multiple handicaps, also has to include subjective indicators of positive life changes, even those not directly associated with hearing.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2004.03.016 | DOI Listing |
PLoS One
January 2025
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Background: Cochlear implants (CI) with off-the-ear (OTE) and behind-the-ear (BTE) speech processors differ in user experience and audiological performance, impacting speech perception, comfort, and satisfaction.
Objectives: This systematic review explores audiological outcomes (speech perception in quiet and noise) and non-audiological factors (device handling, comfort, cosmetics, overall satisfaction) of OTE and BTE speech processors in CI recipients.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA-S guidelines, examining Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.
Int J Audiol
January 2025
Department of Otolaryngology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Objectives: An improvement in speech perception is a major well-documented benefit of cochlear implantation (CI), which is commonly discussed with CI candidates to set expectations. However, a large variability exists in speech perception outcomes. We evaluated the accuracy of clinical predictions of post-CI speech perception scores.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Psychol
January 2025
Institute for General and Hungarian Linguistics, HUN-REN Hungarian Research Centre for Linguistics, Budapest, Hungary.
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFImaging Neurosci (Camb)
April 2024
Department of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.
Listeners with hearing loss have trouble following a conversation in multitalker environments. While modern hearing aids can generally amplify speech, these devices are unable to tune into a target speaker without first knowing to which speaker a user aims to attend. Brain-controlled hearing aids have been proposed using auditory attention decoding (AAD) methods, but current methods use the same model to compare the speech stimulus and neural response, regardless of the dynamic overlap between talkers which is known to influence neural encoding.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Bullying Prev
April 2023
INVEST Flagship Research Center/Department of Psychology and Speech-Language Pathology, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland.
We examined how often teachers' targeted interventions fail in stopping bullying and to what extent this varies between schools vs. between students involved. In addition, we investigated which student-level factors were associated with intervention failure.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!