Objective: To examine whether "all-or-none" guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) are being applied by practitioners on general medical wards (GMWs).
Hypothesis: Do not attempt resuscitation (DNAR) orders are rarely related to patient preferences. Limited resuscitation efforts are being practiced to circumvent the need for DNAR orders.
Design: A surprise opinion survey (presented below), based on case vignette and practice description, and performed by remote control votes.
Setting: The multi-centre forum for practitioners on GMWs within the greater Jerusalem district.
Participants: 79/85 clinicians practicing/training on GMWs in six teaching hospitals, who attended the forum and responded within 3 min to the survey.
Results: Fifty-eight practitioners (73%) assigned a DNAR order for a patient unable to express a preference and only 43 (55%) complied with the request of a competent patient for a DNAR order (P < 0.05]; 95% CI: 2-34). During the past year, only five practitioners (9% of respondents) had performed CPR solely when pathophysiological benefit was expected, 31 (59%) had performed limited CPR efforts and only 13 (28%) had discussed the subject of DNAR with patients and their next of kin >5 times.
Conclusions: (1) DNAR orders are rarely discussed with patients and their next of kin in GMWs within the region examined; (2) even when DNAR is discussed, physicians tend to confer DNAR orders based on their personal value judgements rather than on patient preferences; (3) practitioners on GMWs perform CPR when no pathophysiological benefit is expected; (4) limited resuscitation efforts are performed frequently in GMWs.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.03.024 | DOI Listing |
J Anesth
December 2024
Department of Anesthesiology, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Geriatrics and Gerontology, 35-2, Sakae-Cho, Itabashi-Ku, Tokyo, 173-0015, Japan.
Purpose: We investigated whether patients who have been issued a do-not-attempt-resuscitation order (DNAR) preoperatively (hereafter, DNAR patients) are informed of the DNAR code change when they undergo anesthesia. We also conducted a survey of the awareness of medical staff regarding perioperative DNARs, and investigated the current situation at a single-center in Japan.
Methods: For DNAR patients managed by anesthesiologists from January 2019 to September 2022, we retrospectively investigated whether the patient was informed of the DNAR code change or the DNAR was automatically suspended without explanation.
Monash Bioeth Rev
November 2024
Department of Paramedicine, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Frail and elderly persons approaching end of life who suffer cardiac arrest are often subject to rigorous, undignified, and inappropriate resuscitation attempts despite poor outcomes. This scoping review aims to investigate how people feel about the appropriateness of CPR in this population. This review was guided by the PRISMA-ScR methodological framework.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Cancer
November 2024
Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Int J Emerg Med
October 2024
The Research Office, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, UAE University, Al-Ain, Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!