[Is interval appendectomy necessary after conservative treatment of appendiceal masses?].

Background: This prospective study was conducted to investigate whether interval appendectomy was necessary after successful conservative treatment of appendiceal masses.

Methods: Thirty-seven patients with a diagnosis of appendiceal mass by physical examination and ultrasonography were initially treated conservatively with broad-spectrum antibiotics, anti-inflammatory drugs, and, if required, intravenous fluid treatment. Interval appendectomy was ruled out in 28 patients who responded well to conservative treatment, three of whom were then lost to follow-up. The remaining 25 patients (9 females, 16 males; mean age 25 years; range 17 to 54 years) were monitored for recurrent appendicitis and other causes of appendiceal mass. The mean follow-up period was 35 months (range 6 to 66 months).

Results: The mean duration of abdominal symptoms was nine days (range 3 to 20 days). The mean length of hospital stay was 14 days (range 10 to 21 days) in patients who responded to conservative treatment. Recurrent appendicitis developed in three patients (12%; 2 males, 1 female). Two patients who presented with acute appendicitis within six months after discharge and one patient who developed chronic abdominal right lower quadrant pain unresponsive to medical treatment a year after discharge underwent appendectomy. No other complications were seen with conservative treatment.

Conclusion: We do not recommend routine interval appendectomy in patients who benefit from conservative treatment for an appendiceal mass unless recurrent appendicitis develops.