Accuracy of one-step versus two-step putty wash addition silicone impression technique.

J Prosthet Dent

Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, University of Missouri-Kansas City, School of Dentistry.

Published: May 1992

This study compared the accuracy of one-step putty wash with two-step putty wash impression techniques. Five addition silicone impression materials-Mirror 3 (MR), Mirror 3 Extrude (ME), Express (E), Permagum (P), and Absolute(A)--were tested. A stainless steel model containing two full-crown abutment preparations was used as the positive control. Five replications for one-step and two-step putty wash impressions of the master model were made for each test material. Accuracy of the materials was assessed by measuring six dimensions on stone dies poured from impressions of the master model. Accuracy of addition silicone impression material is affected more by material than technique. Accuracy of the putty wash one-step impression technique was not different from the putty wash two-step impression technique except at one of the six dimensions where one-step was more accurate than two-step. Mirror 3 putty wash two-step impression presented less distortion than Mirror 3 Extrude putty wash one-step or two-step impression.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90151-yDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

putty wash
32
two-step putty
12
addition silicone
12
silicone impression
12
impression technique
12
wash two-step
12
two-step impression
12
accuracy one-step
8
putty
8
wash
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!