Background: There is an ongoing debate regarding the merits of resident work-hour limitations. We postulated that this issue would be a factor in the decision-making process of applicants to surgical residency.

Methods: Candidates for surgical residency at a university-based program completed an anonymous survey during their visit. Data was analyzed by analysis of variance and the chi-square test.

Results: Most candidates viewed work-hour limitations as being favorable to their future training. Nevertheless, work-hour limitations ultimately were not a critical factor in the decision-making process compared with issues such as quality of training and program reputation. Candidates ranked "reading in surgery" the most likely way they would spend the leisure time afforded by work-hour limitations.

Conclusions: Most applicants for surgical residency consider work hour-limitations as being favorable to their training and view the extra free time as an opportunity for furthering their education. However, other issues take precedence when choosing a residency.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.12.066DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

applicants surgical
12
surgical residency
12
work-hour limitations
12
factor decision-making
8
decision-making process
8
attitudes applicants
4
surgical
4
residency
4
residency work
4
work hour
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!