A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Efficacy of the A-line AEP monitor as a tool for predicting successful insertion of a laryngeal mask during sevoflurane anesthesia. | LitMetric

Background: The use of clinical signs for assessing depth of anesthesia is unreliable during periods with little noxious stimulation. A patient may appear adequately anesthetized at one moment at a given level of stimulation, but may later, when facing other more intense stimuli, show signs of insufficient anesthesia. In order to prevent under- or overdosing of anesthetics, an anesthesia depth monitor that is able to predict responses to noxious stimulation would therefore be useful. Auditory evoked potentials (AEP) is one of several physiological parameters under investigation. The method has been improved by rapid extraction and conversion of the AEP curve into an index (A-Line ARX Index = AAI). We aimed to determine the clinically required depth of anesthesia, measured by the A-line AEP Monitor, for at least 90% probability of acceptable insertion conditions for a laryngeal mask airway (LMA).

Methods: We studied 112 patients anesthetized by mask with increasing concentration of sevoflurane in oxygen. The monitor was programmed to give an alarm at AAI between 15 and 40 according to randomization. When the alarm sounded, the end-expiratory sevoflurane concentration was recorded and the LMA inserted. Insertion conditions were assessed by an observer blinded to the AAI.

Results: The ED(95) and prediction probability (P(K)) for AAI were 14.5 (CI 7.4-21.6) and 0.76 (0.66-0.86), respectively, while the ED(95) and P(K) for expiratory sevoflurane concentration were 4.36% (CI 3.73-4.98) and 0.95 (0.91-0.99).

Conclusions: AAI indicates the level of depth of anesthesia necessary for acceptable laryngeal mask insertion conditions. End-expiratory sevoflurane concentration was the better predictor.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0001-5172.2004.00425.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

laryngeal mask
12
depth anesthesia
12
insertion conditions
12
sevoflurane concentration
12
a-line aep
8
aep monitor
8
noxious stimulation
8
end-expiratory sevoflurane
8
anesthesia
6
sevoflurane
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!