Is the information about a test important? Applying the methods of evidence-based medicine to the clinical examination of swallowing.

J Commun Disord

Department of Communicative Disorders, University of Florida, P.O. Box 100174, 101 South Newell Drive, Room 2150, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.

Published: December 2004

Unlabelled: A hotly debated topic in oropharyngeal dysphagia is the Clinical Swallowing Examination's (CSE) importance in clinical practice. That debate can profit from the application of evidence-based medicine's (EBM) principles and procedures. These can guide both appropriate data collection and interpretation as will be demonstrated in the present report. The study's purpose from which data for this report are drawn was to determine the relationship among signs elicited by a CSE and aspiration on a subsequent videofluoroscopic swallowing examination (VFSE). Sensitivity, specificity; positive and negative predictive values (NPV); likelihood ratios; and post-test probabilities for a variety of signs in isolation and in combinations are reported. These data, if judiciously selected and interpreted contribute to the clinician's knowledge about whether to follow a CSE with a VFSE and about what to expect if the VFSE is completed.

Learning Outcomes: (1) Clinicians will learn how to use EBM principles in conjunction with clinical assessments of swallowing to enhance patient care. (2) Clinicians will learn how to identify combinations of patient signs during he CSE to predict VFSE performance.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2004.04.007DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ebm principles
8
clinicians will
8
will learn
8
test important?
4
important? applying
4
applying methods
4
methods evidence-based
4
evidence-based medicine
4
clinical
4
medicine clinical
4

Similar Publications

Background: Post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) is a common cosmetic concern, often leading to significant psychological distress for the patients. With the widespread application of lasers including ablative fractional resurfacing (AFR) with a 10,600 nm CO laser, PIH caused by lasers is becoming increasingly common. But due to the absence of an appropriate animal research model, our understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms and preventive strategies for PIH remains limited.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Evidence-based medicine integrates clinical research, personal expertise, and patient values. The most robust forms of clinical evidence, such as randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective studies, provide the strongest support for medical decision-making. RCTs are vital in radiology for evaluating new imaging technologies, contrast agents, and therapeutic procedures, despite challenges in translating preclinical findings to clinical practice.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

3D Assessment of Mandibular Margin Morphological Change after BTX-A Injection for Masseter Hypertrophy: A Retrospective Study.

Aesthetic Plast Surg

December 2024

The Plastic and Aesthetic Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, No. 23 Youzheng Street, Nangang District, Harbin, 150000, Heilongjiang, P. R. China.

Background: Some facial morphological changes may occur in some patients after botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) injection for the treatment of masseteric hypertrophy. The aim of this study was to investigate the morphological changes that occurred on mandibular margin.

Methods: This retrospective analysis included 43 patients (86 lateral cases) who received BTX-A injections for masseter hypertrophy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Philosophical and Ethical Underpinnings of the Medical Decision-Making Process: A Focus on Patient Values and Preferences.

Ann Pharmacother

November 2024

Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.

Current clinical practice is based on the principles of evidence-based medicine (EBM) with clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) often serving as a source of information for the medical decision-making process. There are philosophical and ethical tenets underlying this process including those pertaining to patient values and preferences. Despite their importance, these tenets may receive less attention than the empirically derived recommendations in CPGs based on the principles of EBM.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Ethical challenges for Health Technology Assessment (HTA) in the evolving evidence landscape.

Int J Technol Assess Health Care

November 2024

Department of Health, Medicine, and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

Since its inception, Health Technology Assessment (HTA) has typically determined the value of a technology by collecting information derived from randomized clinical trials (RCTs), in line with the principles of evidence-based medicine (EBM). However, data from RCTs did not constitute the sole source of information, as other types of evidence (such as primary qualitative research) have often been utilized. Recent advances in both generating and collecting other types of evidence are broadening the landscape of evidence, adding complexity to the discussion of "robustness of evidence.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!