Objective: In type 2 diabetes, therapies to maintain blood glucose control usually fail after several years. We estimated the glycemic burden that accumulates from treatment failure and describe the time course and predictors of failure.

Research Design And Methods: A prospective, population-based study using retrospective observational data. We identified all 7208 complete courses of treatment with nondrug therapy, sulfonylurea monotherapy, metformin monotherapy, and combination oral antihyperglycemic therapy between 1994 and 2002, inclusive, among members of the Kaiser Permanente Northwest Region. We calculated mean cumulative glycemic burden, defined as HbA(1c)-months >8.0 or 7.0% for each treatment. We then measured the likelihood that the next HbA(1c) would exceed 8.0 and 7.0% after HbA(1c) exceeded each of ten hypothetical treatment thresholds. Finally, we estimated multivariate logistic regression models to predict when HbA(1c) would continue to deteriorate.

Results: In this well-controlled population, the average patient accumulated nearly 5 HbA(1c)-years of excess glycemic burden >8.0% from diagnosis until starting insulin and about 10 HbA(1c)-years of burden >7.0%. Whenever patients crossed the American Diabetes Association-recommended treatment threshold of 8.0%, their next HbA(1c) result was as likely to be <8.0 as >8.0%. Multivariate prediction models had highly statistically significant coefficients, but predicted <10% of the variation in future HbA(1c) results.

Conclusions: Clinicians should change glucose-lowering treatments in type 2 diabetes much sooner or use treatments that are less likely to fail. An action point at 7.0% or lower is more likely to prevent additional deterioration than the traditional action point of 8.0%.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/diacare.27.7.1535DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

glycemic burden
12
treatment failure
8
type diabetes
8
burden
5
treatment
5
burden treatment
4
failure type
4
diabetes objective
4
objective type
4
diabetes therapies
4

Similar Publications

Predictive value of system immune-inflammation index for the severity of coronary stenosis in patients with coronary heart disease and diabetes mellitus.

Sci Rep

December 2024

Department of Endocrinology, The First Clinical Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.

Coronary heart disease (CHD) has been recognized as a chronic progressive inflammatory disorder, and Diabetes mellitus (DM) is an independent risk factor for the pathogenesis of CHD. Recent research has underscored the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) as a potent prognostic indicator for individuals suffering from acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This study aimed to delve into the relationship between SII and the degree of coronary atherosclerotic stenosis in non-acute myocardial infarction patients with or without DM.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Emerging adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) struggle with glycemic management that can be exacerbated by a disorganized transition process. Substantial gaps in care have been noted during this transition period and have been shown to lead to suboptimal health care utilization, worsening glycemic management, increased incidence of serious complications, and mental health challenges. A formal transition program can help prevent gaps in care, improve disease self-management skills, decrease disease burden, and reduce diabetes complications.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of a static, text-based diabetes education and support intervention (Dulce Digital, DD) versus a dynamic approach with personalized feedback and goal setting (Dulce Digital-Me, DD-Me) in improving diabetes outcomes.

Design And Methods: Comparative effectiveness trial in 310 Latine adults with poorly managed type 2 diabetes in a Federally Qualified Health Center in Southern California, randomized to DD, DD-Me-Auto (algorithm-driven text-based personalized feedback), or DD-Me-Tel (coach delivered personalized feedback). Changes in HbA1c (primary outcome), low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, and patient-reported outcomes were examined across 6 and 12 months, with the primary comparison being DD versus DD-Me (combined automated and telephonic).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

of what is New or Different 1. This chapter recommends a target HbA1c of ≤6.5% (48mmol/mol) for those who have access to advanced diabetes technologies like continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and automated insulin delivery (AID).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The double life of glucose metabolism: brain health, glycemic homeostasis, and your patients with type 2 diabetes.

BMC Med

December 2024

Sanders-Brown Center On Aging, Department of Chemistry, University of Kentucky, 249 Chemistry-Physics Building, Lexington, KY, 40506-0055, USA.

The maintenance of cognitive function is essential for quality of life and health outcomes in later years. Cognitive impairment, however, remains an undervalued long-term complication of type 2 diabetes by patients and providers alike. The burden of sustained hyperglycemia includes not only cognitive deficits but also the onset and progression of dementia-related conditions, including Alzheimer's disease (AD).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!