A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Contrast-enhanced US in the assessment of the ilio-caval axis in deep venous thrombosis. | LitMetric

Purpose: To assess the feasibility and the accuracy of a new technique in the evaluation of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in the ilio-caval axis.

Materials And Methods: Thirty-eight patients with suspected DVT were prospectively examined with unenhanced and enhanced colour-Doppler ultrasonography, and ascending contrast venography. Thirty-five out of 38 patients underwent US phlebography, consisting in manual injection of Levovist (Schering Ag, Berlin, Germany) through a 21-G cannula in a suitable dorsal vein of the foot ipsilateral to the suspected DVT. Three patients in whom it was not possible to cannulate a dorsal vein of foot underwent contrast-enhanced US after injection of Levovist through an antecubital vein, but where excluded from the present study. A contrast venogram was nonetheless carried out in all out three patients for comparison with the US-phlebography findings.

Results: US-phlebography allowed better definition of the presence and extension of deep vein thrombosis in all patients, when compared to conventional color-Doppler US. In the evaluation of suspected acute thrombosis, the comparative efficacy of Doppler-US and US phlebography compared with ascending phlebography as the gold standard, was as follows: sensitivity of 85.7% and 90%, specificity of 71.4 and 100%, accuracy of 80.9 and 95.2%, PPV of 85.7, and 100%, and NPV of 71.4, and 75%, respectively. In the assessment of chronic thrombosis, US and US phlebography achieved a sensitivity of 90% and 100%, a specificity of 75% and 100%, an accuracy of 85.7% and 100%, a PPV of 100, 100%, a NPV of 87.5, 100%, respectively. No complications related to US phlebography were observed.

Conclusions: US-phlebography is a promising tool in the assessment of deep vein thrombosis, being highly accurate and feasible. However, further studies based on larger series are mandatory to confirm our promising results and establish a standardised role for this new technique.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

deep venous
8
venous thrombosis
8
suspected dvt
8
injection levovist
8
dorsal vein
8
vein foot
8
three patients
8
deep vein
8
vein thrombosis
8
100% accuracy
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!