A survey addressing practices of 'expert' neuropsychologists in handling financial compensation claim or personal injury litigation cases was carried out. Potential participants were identified by publication history. Responses were obtained from 24 out of the 39 neuropsychologists who were surveyed. Approximately 79% of the respondents reported using at least one specialized technique for detecting malingering in every litigant assessment. Half stated that they always give specialized tests at the beginning of the assessment. The Rey 15-Item test and the Test of Memory Malingering were the most frequently reported measures. Respondents also reported frequent use of 'malingering' indexes from standard neuropsychological tests. Reported base-rates varied, but the majority of respondents indicated that at least 10% of the litigants they assessed in the last year were definitely malingering. Respondents were split on the practice of routinely giving warnings at the outset of assessments that suboptimal performance may be detected. However, when the client's motivational status was suspect, more than half (58.3%) altered their assessment routine at least on some occasions, by encouraging good effort (70.8%) or administering additional SVTs. A minority directly confronted or warned clients (25%), terminated the examination earlier than planned (16.6%), or contacted the referring attorney immediately (29.2%). Respondents almost always stated some opinion regarding indicators of invalidity in written reports (95%). However, 41.7% rarely used the term 'malingering' and 12.5% never used the term. Most respondents (>80%) instead stated that the test results are invalid, inconsistent with the severity of the injury or indicative of exaggeration.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2003.04.001 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Enhanced detection of suboptimal effort in psychoeducational assessments for dyslexia.
Clin Neuropsychol
November 2024
Regional Assessment & Resource Centre, Queens University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Article Synopsis
- - Performance validity tests (PVTs) are commonly used in neuropsychological assessments, but they are less frequently applied in diagnosing specific learning disabilities like dyslexia, despite the risk of noncredible test scores in students.
- - The study introduces the Dyslexia Assessment of Simulation or Honesty-Revised (DASH-R), a specialized PVT aimed at identifying individuals who exaggerate symptoms during dyslexia evaluations.
- - Results indicated that the DASH-R effectively distinguished between honest responders, those with diagnosed dyslexia, and individuals simulating dyslexia, showcasing high specificity and sensitivity when using a composite feigning index for diagnostic purposes.
Clinical and neuroimaging patterns of perinatal intracranial haemorrhage in fetuses and term-born neonates: a prospective observational cohort study.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed
October 2024
Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Article Synopsis
- The study aimed to characterize perinatal intracranial hemorrhage (pICH), focusing on differences between cases diagnosed before and after birth and analyzing their causes and clinical patterns.
- Conducted over a decade, the research included 110 pICH cases, revealing that intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) was most prevalent, particularly in prenatally diagnosed cases, while subpial hemorrhage was exclusively identified postnatally.
- The findings indicated that genetic disorders contributed to nearly a third of pICH cases, highlighting the necessity for next-generation sequencing to better understand genetic factors associated with prenatally diagnosed hemorrhages.
Examining the utility of the BAARS-IV scales as embedded symptom validity indicators for adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder evaluations.
Clin Neuropsychol
October 2024
Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Article Synopsis
- This study explored whether high cut-scores on the Barkley Adult ADHD Rating Scale-Fourth Edition (BAARS-IV) can indicate when adults might be overreporting ADHD symptoms during evaluations.
- Researchers analyzed data from 162 adults, dividing them into valid and invalid groups based on their symptom validity tests, and found that certain cut-scores effectively distinguished between these groups.
- The study suggests using specific cut-scores from the Current Total and Current Sluggish Cognitive Tempo scales together to better identify symptom overreporting, recommending that scores above these thresholds should lead to further examination of the patient's claims.
Using behavior and eye-fixations to detect feigned memory impairment.
Front Psychol
September 2024
Neuropsychology Service, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal.
Article Synopsis
- The study investigates how healthy individuals and patients with Multiple Sclerosis respond to a computerized memory test under different conditions, comparing standard instructions to those feigning memory impairment.
- Findings reveal that participants feigning impairment showed different eye-fixation patterns and response times, indicating they preferred new stimuli over familiar ones.
- The research suggests that tracking eye movements can help identify exaggerated claims of cognitive dysfunction, though this method may not be as effective with clinical populations.
Analyzing the relationship between processing speed impairment and Rey-15 item test performance.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol
October 2024
Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Article Synopsis
- - This study explored how the severity of processing speed impairment affects performance on the Rey 15-Item Test (RFIT) and its recognition variant, revealing that those with intact processing speed scored better than those with reduced or impaired speeds.
- - Data from 285 neuropsychological assessments were analyzed, using various standardized tests to measure processing speed and other cognitive functions, with results showing significant predictive power from both verbal/visual memory and processing speed.
- - While the RFIT tests showed good classification accuracy for individuals with intact processing speed, their effectiveness dropped significantly for those with impaired speeds, indicating that the RFIT may not be suitable for evaluating individuals with greater processing speed deficits.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!