In this work, we describe the performance of an atmospheric pressure photoionization (APPI) source for sampling liquid flows. The results presented here primarily focus on the mechanism of direct photoionization (PI), as compared to the dopant mechanism of PI. Measured detection limits for direct APPI were comparable to atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI; e.g., 1 pg for reserpine). The ion signal is linear up to 10 ng injected quantity, with a useful dynamic range exceeding 100 ng. Evidence is presented indicating that APPI achieves significantly better sensitivity than APCI at flow rates below 200 microL/min, making it a useful source for capillary liquid chromatography and capillary electrophoresis. Results are presented indicating that APPI is less susceptible to ion suppression and salt buffer effects than APCI and electrospray ionization (ESI). The principal benefit of APPI, as compared to other ionization sources, is in efficiently ionizing broad classes of nonpolar compounds. Thus, APPI is an important complement to ESI and APCI by expanding the range and classes of compounds that can be analyzed. In this paper, we also discuss the role of direct APPI vs PI-induced APCI using dopants.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac035442i | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!