A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Fibular position in relation to lateral ankle instability. | LitMetric

Fibular position in relation to lateral ankle instability.

Foot Ankle Int

Tripler Army Medical Center, Orthopaedic Surgery Service Foot and Ankle Section, 1 Jarrett-White Road, Honolulu, HI 96859-5000, USA.

Published: May 2004

Background: The position of the fibula within the ankle mortise may be a factor contributing to recurrent ankle instability. The current study was performed to determine whether significant differences in fibular position exist in a population of patients who underwent lateral ankle stabilization procedures. The hypothesis that a fibula positioned posteriorly within the mortise predisposes the ankle to chronic instability was evaluated.

Methods: Sixty-five CT/MRI scans of patients who underwent lateral ankle stabilization procedures from 1998 to 2001 were reviewed. The position of the fibula in relation to the tibia at the ankle mortise was expressed as the axial malleolar index (AMI). A greater AMI corresponds to a more posterior fibula. The AMI was also calculated from 65 CT/MRI scans performed on control patients who had no ankle instability.

Results: The average AMI in the study group was 17 degrees +/- 6 degrees (SD) compared with an average of 9 degrees +/- 4 degrees (SD) in the control group (p <.01). Therefore, the fibula was nearly twice as posterior in patients undergoing ankle reconstruction. In 42/65 (65%) study patients, the AMI was greater than 15 degrees. Only 5/65 (8%) control patients had AMI values greater than 15 degrees. This corresponds to an eightfold greater likelihood of AMI greater that 15 degrees in the instability group than in the control group.

Conclusions: This study supports the hypothesis that a posteriorly positioned fibula predisposes to ankle instability.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/107110070402500507DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lateral ankle
12
fibular position
8
ankle
8
ankle instability
8
position fibula
8
ankle mortise
8
patients underwent
8
underwent lateral
8
ankle stabilization
8
stabilization procedures
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!