A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The visual and haptic perception of natural object shape. | LitMetric

The visual and haptic perception of natural object shape.

Percept Psychophys

Department of Psychology, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, Kentucky 42101, USA.

Published: February 2004

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study assessed how well people can compare 3-D objects using both sight and touch.
  • In one experiment, participants felt one object and then identified which of 12 visible objects matched in shape, achieving a 72% accuracy after multiple trials.
  • The second experiment involved pairs of objects where participants determined if their shapes matched, revealing slight performance differences between using just vision or touch compared to combining both senses.
  • Overall, the findings indicate that while vision and touch share some overlapping abilities in perceiving 3-D shapes, they do not function identically.

Article Abstract

In this study, we evaluated observers' ability to compare naturally shaped three-dimensional (3-D) objects, using their senses of vision and touch. In one experiment, the observers haptically manipulated 1 object and then indicated which of 12 visible objects possessed the same shape. In the second experiment, pairs of objects were presented, and the observers indicated whether their 3-D shape was the same or different. The 2 objects were presented either unimodally (vision-vision or haptic-haptic) or cross-modally (vision-haptic or haptic-vision). In both experiments, the observers were able to compare 3-D shape across modalities with reasonably high levels of accuracy. In Experiment 1, for example, the observers' matching performance rose to 72% correct (chance performance was 8.3%) after five experimental sessions. In Experiment 2, small (but significant) differences in performance were obtained between the unimodal vision-vision condition and the two cross-modal conditions. Taken together, the results suggest that vision and touch have functionally overlapping, but not necessarily equivalent, representations of 3-D shape.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/bf03194883DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

3-d shape
12
vision touch
8
objects presented
8
shape
5
visual haptic
4
haptic perception
4
perception natural
4
natural object
4
object shape
4
shape study
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!