Fluid choice for resuscitation of the trauma patient: a review of the physiological, pharmacological, and clinical evidence.

Purpose: Volume replacement regimens are discussed very emotionally. Interpretation of the literature is difficult due to variations in study design, patient population, target for volume replacement, endpoints, and type of fluids. Meta-analyses may not be very helpful because all kinds of patients and very old studies are included. The principles and options for volume replacement were reviewed exclusively in trauma patients and studies from the literature focusing on this problem were analyzed.

Source: Using a MEDLINE search, volume replacement therapy in adult trauma patients published in the English language from 1985 to the end of 2002 were identified and analyzed. Studies on prehospital volume replacement, volume replacement in the emergency area or in the operating room, and volume therapy in trauma intensive care unit patients were included.

Principle Findings: The age-old crystalloid/colloid controvery has still not been resolved but has been enlarged to a colloid/colloid debate. It is now widely accepted that human albumin could easily be replaced by synthetic colloids for volume replacement in trauma patients. No superiority of a specific volume replacement strategy with regard to outcome was found. However, in several studies outcome was not the major endpoint. Although showing some promising results, the importance of hypertonic solutions for volume replacement in the trauma patient is not yet defined.

Conclusion: The choice of fluid therapy in trauma patients engenders the most controversy and an examination of the body of literature on this subject results in confusion. It is imperative to continue the search for substances that are effective in avoiding the development of post-trauma multi-organ dysfunction syndrome without detrimental side-effects.