Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The aim was to determine whether adverse effects of leukocytapheresis (LCAP) are related to nafamostat mesilate (NM) as an anticoagulant. Anti-NM IgE were detected in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients who were administrated LCAP in our institute. Forty-nine patients (ulcerative colitis (UC)/Crohn's disease (CD): 30/19) were evaluated. Anti-NM IgE was measured by the ELISA method. Total IgE level and eosinophil count was tested concurrently. We retrospectively checked the presence of allergic symptoms and medications used concurrently with LCAP. Anti-NM IgE were present in six symptomatic patients (6/49; 12.2%) whose adverse effects were highly suspected to be from NM. However, 21 patients showed anti NM IgE-negative, in spite of the fact that their adverse effects were also highly suspected to be from NM. Through the detection of anti-NM IgE alone we could not estimate the relevance of NM as an anticoagulant to the adverse effects of LCAP.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-0968.2004.00086.x | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!