Background: mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) consists of orthograde fluid preparation to clean the bowel. MBP is considered to prevent postoperative complications.

Methods: meta-analysis of prospective randomised clinical trials (RCT) evaluating MBP versus no MBP.

Results: following a medline search we retrieved 15 prospective trials of which only 5 where RCT comparing MBP versus no MBP in elective colorectal surgery. For the randomised studies, there were respectively 186, 179, 149, 267 and 380 patients, including all type of resections. The total number of patients in these 5 studies was 1144 (565 with MBP and 579 with no preparation). All patients received perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. Only one of these RCT show a significant decrease in anastomotic leak (AL), but among all the patients enrolled, AL is significantly more frequent in the group with MBP (Odds Ratio 1.8). Wound infection, re-operation and intra-abdominal abscess rates were more frequent in the MBP group but the difference did not reach statistical significance and the odds ratios for a 95% confidence interval were extremely large.

Conclusion: there is limited evidence in the literature to support the use of MBP in patient undergoing elective colorectal surgery. Available data tend to suggest that MBP could be harmful with respect to the incidence of anastomotic leak. Moreover, MBP does not reduce the incidence of other infectious complications. Further RCTs are needed to establish an evidence-based rationale for the use of MBP in elective colorectal surgery.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.4414/smw.2004.10452DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

elective colorectal
16
mbp
12
colorectal surgery
12
mechanical bowel
8
bowel preparation
8
trials rct
8
mbp versus
8
mbp elective
8
anastomotic leak
8
preparation
4

Similar Publications

Background: While existing risk calculators focus on mortality and complications, elderly patients are concerned with how operations will affect their quality of life, especially their independence. We sought to develop a novel clinically relevant and easy-to-use score to predict elderly patients' loss of independence after gastrointestinal surgery.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients age ≥ 65 years enrolled in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database and Geriatric Pilot Project who underwent pancreatic, colorectal, or hepatic surgery (January 1, 2014- December 31, 2018).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Derivation and validation of a prediction model for inadequate bowel preparation in Chinese outpatients.

Sci Rep

January 2025

Nursing Department, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Building 17, 3rd Floor 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, China.

The quality of bowel preparation is an important factor in the success of colonoscopy. However, multiple influencing factors that function together can lead to inadequate bowel preparation. The main objective of this study was to explore the specific factors that affect the quality of bowel preparation, with the goal of deriving and validating a predictive model for inadequate bowel preparation in Chinese outpatients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Incidence of surgical infection in cefazolin 3 g versus 2 g for colorectal surgery in obese patients.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol

January 2025

Department of Pharmacy Services, Trinity Health Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Objective: To compare the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) between cefazolin 3 g and 2 g surgical prophylaxis in patients weighing ≥120 kg that undergo elective colorectal surgery.

Methods: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study was performed utilizing a validated database of elective colorectal surgeries in Michigan acute care hospitals. Adults weighing ≥120 kg who received cefazolin and metronidazole for surgical prophylaxis between 7/2012 and 6/2021 were included.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To explore the association of socioeconomic status (SES) and race/ethnicity with perioperative metrics within the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) framework to identify gaps for equity-informed improvements.

Summary Background Data: Although ERAS pathways improve perioperative outcomes through standardized care, disparities in protocol adherence and postoperative outcomes persist, particularly for vulnerable populations.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a single-institution database of elective colorectal surgeries (2018-2021).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Multimodal prehabilitation programs, which may incorporate nutritional supplementation and exercise, have been developed to combat sarcopenia in surgical patients to enhance post-operative outcomes. However, the optimal regime remains unknown. The use of beta-hydroxy beta-methylbutyrate (HMB) has beneficial effects on muscle mass and strength.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!