Since October 2001 the German Ministry of Health and Social Security has been funding 10 projects to introduce shared decision making in clinical practice. A national meeting was held on assessment procedures to achieve consensus on a core set of instruments for the measurement of process and outcome of shared decision making. Project collaboration is co-ordinated through the methodological centre in Freiburg. Currently there are no validated measuring instruments available for German-speaking countries. Thus four international questionnaires were translated into German. In a second step the questionnaires were validated on a sample of 646 patients across 10 different diseases. To this purpose, the data of these 10 projects were combined in one database. Comprehensibility of the questionnaires used was checked in patient interviews. Moreover, the semantic structure of the questionnaires was tested by the Centre for Surveys. Methods and Analyses (ZUMA) in Mannheim. The results of this assessment process point towards problems of both comprehensibility and lack of specification of reference points for clinical decision. The statistical results for two of these questionnaires deviate from previous studies. These data indicate a potential for improving the instruments currently used for shared decision making. Separate validation across different languages and health care systems is needed in the field of shared decision making. Further research efforts on the methodological field now focus on the integration of these results with a new measuring instrument and the validation of this tool.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
JMIR Form Res
January 2025
Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant public health issue and a leading cause of death and disability globally. Advances in clinical care have improved survival rates, leading to a growing population living with long-term effects of TBI, which can impact physical, cognitive, and emotional health. These effects often require continuous management and individualized care.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPsychiatr Pol
October 2024
Katedra Psychologii Klinicznej i Psychoprofilaktyki, Instytut Psychologii, Uniwersytet Szczeciński.
Eating disorders are a considerable and prevalent problem among adolescents. Due to their significant adverse health consequences, it is of key importance to examine available treatment options and their effects. Despite the shared criteria for eating disorders in adolescents and adults, the diagnostic and therapeutic processes in the former require distinct specialist interventions, including the entire family environment.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Med Ethics
January 2025
Ethics and Work Research Unit, Institute of Advanced Studies (EPHE), Paris, France.
Aim: To carry out a detailed study of existing positions in the French public of the acceptability of refusing treatment because of alleged futility, and to try to link these to people's age, gender, and religious practice.
Method: 248 lay participants living in southern France were presented with 16 brief vignettes depicting a cancer patient at the end of life who asks his doctor to administer a new cancer treatment he has heard about. Considering that this treatment is futile in the patient's case, the doctor refuses to prescribe it.
Sci Rep
January 2025
Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Decades of research hold that empathy is a multifaceted construct. A related challenge in empathy research is to describe how each subcomponent of empathy uniquely contributes to social outcomes. Here, we examined distinct mechanisms through which different components of empathy-Empathic Concern, Perspective Taking, and Personal Distress-may relate to prosociality.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Kidney Dis
January 2025
School of Nursing, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, U.S.A.
Rationale & Objective: Sharing Patient's Illness Representations to Increase Trust (SPIRIT) is an evidence-based advance care planning intervention targeting dialysis patients and their surrogate decision-makers. To address SPIRIT's implementation potential, we report on a process evaluation in our recently completed five-state cluster-randomized trial.
Study Design: A descriptive study of implementation within a randomized clinical trial.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!