Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The vortex method is applied to simulations of Rayleigh-Taylor (RT) and Richtmyer-Meshkov (RM) instabilities. The numerical results from the vortex method agree well with analytic solutions and other numerical results. The bubble velocity in the RT instability converges to a constant limit, and in the RM instability, the bubble and spike have decaying growth rates, except for the spike of infinite density ratio. For both RT and RM instabilities, bubbles attain constant asymptotic curvatures. It is found that, for the same density ratio, the RT bubble has slightly larger asymptotic curvature than the RM bubble. The vortex sheet strength of the RM interface has different behavior than that of the RT interface. We also examine the validity of theoretical models by comparing the numerical results with theoretical predictions.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.69.036703 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!