Background: The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Privacy Rule, intended to address potential threats to patient privacy posed by the computerization and standardization of medical records, provides a new floor level of federal protection for health information in all 50 states. In most cases, compliance with the Privacy Rule was required as of April 2003. Yet considerable confusion and concern remain about the Privacy Rule and the specific changes it requires in the way healthcare providers, health plans, and others use, maintain, and disclose health information. Researchers worry that the Privacy Rule could hinder their access to health information needed to conduct their research.

Objectives: In this article, we explain how the final version of the Privacy Rule governs disclosure of health information, assess implications of the Privacy Rule for research, and offer practical suggestions for researchers who require access to health information.

Conclusion: The Privacy Rule is fundamentally changing the way that healthcare providers, health plans, and others use, maintain, and disclose health information and the steps that researchers must take to obtain health data. The Privacy Rule requires researchers who seek access to identifiable health information to obtain written authorization from subjects, or, alternatively, to demonstrate that their research protocols meet certain Privacy Rule requirements that permit access without written authorization. To ensure continued access to data, researchers will need to work more closely than before with healthcare providers, health plans, and other institutions that generate and maintain health information.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000119578.94846.f2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

privacy rule
40
health
14
healthcare providers
12
providers health
12
health plans
12
privacy
11
rule
10
health insurance
8
insurance portability
8
portability accountability
8

Similar Publications

Introduction: This real-world study assessed the effectiveness of bebtelovimab (BEB) versus nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NR) among outpatients with COVID-19 during the Omicron variant era.

Methods: We conducted a cohort study evaluating patients treated with BEB or NR from February to August 2022 (study period). Follow-up began the day after treatment and continued for 30 days.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Chronic diseases are a global health challenge, and therefore, more attention should be paid to improving self-efficacy in people with chronic diseases. This study examined the relationship between family health and self-efficacy, and explored the mediating role of perceived social support and the moderating role of health literacy. The aim is to enhance the self-efficacy of chronic patients by improving family health, social support, and health literacy, thereby improving their physical and mental state.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study investigates the link between oral ulcerative mucositis (both chemotherapy and radiotherapy-induced) and the burden of illness, dysphagia, and disparities in patients with cancers of the oral cavity and those undergoing stem cell transplants.
  • Using national data, the research found that chemotherapy-induced oral ulcerative mucositis is associated with longer hospital stays and a higher likelihood of dysphagia in both cancer and transplant patients, while radiotherapy-induced mucositis only increased hospital stays without impacting dysphagia.
  • The findings stress the importance of better screening and prevention strategies for oral mucositis, particularly focusing on vulnerable groups, and suggest future studies explore AI for predicting mucositis outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction We aimed to describe the relationship of educational attainment with the prevalence of six health outcomes (ever and current smoking, diabetes, hypertension, coronary artery disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) in an older adult population, including whether education-health relationships differed by health outcome, by racial and ethnic (racial/ethnic) group, and by racial/ethnic group within the same level of education. Methods This cross-sectional study used 2015-2016 electronic health record data for 149,417 non-Hispanic White (White), 15,398 African-American or other Black (Black), 15,319 Hispanic or Latino (Latino), 10,133 Filipino, and 8810 Chinese Northern California health plan members aged 65-79 years whose preferred language was English. For each racial/ethnic group, sex-specific age-standardized prevalence of the six health outcomes was estimated for four levels of education (non-high school graduate, high school graduate, some college, college graduate).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • This study highlights the importance of gathering input from parents, teachers, and children regarding the psychosocial needs of pediatric cancer survivors during their school reintegration process.
  • Analysis showed varying levels of agreement between reports from parents, teachers, and the children themselves, with parents often rating internal emotional issues higher while teachers noted more external behavior symptoms.
  • The results emphasize the need for better collaboration among families, schools, and healthcare providers to ensure comprehensive support for pediatric cancer survivors.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!