Effects of dorsal flanges on fixation of a cemented total hip replacement femoral stem.

J Bone Joint Surg Am

Biomechanics Laboratory, Los Angeles Orthopaedic Hospital, 2400 South Flower Street, Los Angeles, CA 90007-2697, USA.

Published: April 2004

Background: Although current designs of cemented femoral stems for total hip replacement include both those with and those without a flanged shape at the proximal end, the influence of anteroposterior dorsal flanges on the fixation of the stem is not completely understood. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of flanges on femoral stem stability and load transfer to the femur with use of an in vitro model.

Methods: We measured femoral surface strains and three-dimensional micromotion in synthetic femora under cyclic loading with four types of stems: those with flanges and those without flanges in two sizes each. The four types of stems were otherwise identical; that is, all of them were straight, polished, and collarless. Stem-cement micromotion measurements and strain measurements were repeated with three stems of each type, whereas bone-cement micromotion measurements were made with one stem of each type.

Results: Flanges had a greater influence on femoral strains and micromotion than did the difference in the cement thickness resulting from the different stem sizes. Specifically, the flanged stems produced greater strains on the medial femoral surface but smaller strains on the anterior surface than did the non-flanged stems. Flanged stems achieved tighter mechanical interlock within the cement, but these stems increased bone-cement micromotion. Specifically, the motion per cycle of flanged stems within the cement mantle was smaller than that of non-flanged stems, whereas the motion per cycle of the cement mantle within the femoral canal was greater with the flanged stems than with the non-flanged stems.

Conclusions: Flanges on a total hip femoral stem increase the interlock between the stem and the cement and decrease the proximal-medial stress-shielding. However, these advantages occur with increased bone-cement interface motion, which may be detrimental to the survival of the implant.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200404000-00022DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

flanged stems
16
total hip
12
femoral stem
12
stems
11
dorsal flanges
8
flanges fixation
8
hip replacement
8
femoral
8
femoral surface
8
types stems
8

Similar Publications

Improper osteotomy during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can lead to anterior femoral notching, which increases the risk of periprosthetic fractures due to stress concentration. One potential solution is the addition of an intramedullary stem to the femoral component. However, the optimal stem length remains unclear.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

What factors can reduce the need for repeated revision for humeral loosening in revision total elbow arthroplasty?

J Shoulder Elbow Surg

July 2023

Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA; Florida Orthopaedic Institute (FOI), Tampa, FL, USA. Electronic address:

Article Synopsis
  • The study looked at patients who had surgery to fix loose parts in their elbows, finding out how often they needed to have surgery again afterward.
  • Researchers thought that changing the sizes of the elbow implants would help keep them stable better than just changing one part.
  • They found that about 25% of patients needed more surgery after an average of 4.2 years, and people with rheumatoid arthritis were more likely to need it again.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

[Humeral bone defects in revision shoulder arthroplasty].

Orthopadie (Heidelb)

February 2023

Klinik für Orthopädie, Unfallchirurgie, Schulter- und Ellenbogenchirurgie und Endoprothetik, Rhön-Klinikum, Campus Bad Neustadt/Saale, Salzburger Leite 1, 97616, Bad Neustadt/Saale, Deutschland.

Background: Revision shoulder arthroplasty is mainly performed with reverse TSA and should consider proper adjustment of the length and the amount of bone loss in humeral reconstruction. Whilst epi-/metaphyseal bone loss can mostly be compensated easily by stemmed standard implants, advanced bone loss exceeding 2° requires the support of longer revision stems.

Extensive Humeral Bone Loss: Cementless fixation in the intact diaphyseal humerus is recommended in bone loss exceeding 2°, preferably with modular revision systems, because cemented reverse revision stems have higher loosening rates in the mid to long-term follow-up.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In this study, we use an exceptional skeleton of the pachycephalosaur Stegoceras validum (UALVP 2) to inform a comprehensive appendicular muscle reconstruction of the animal, with the goal of better understanding the functional morphology of the pachycephalosaur postcranial skeleton. We find that S. validum possessed a conservative forelimb musculature, particularly in comparison to early saurischian bipeds.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In this study, thermoelastic stress analysis was conducted to clarify the surface stress distribution of a femur in which a BiCONTACT E stem was inserted. The contact sites between the stem and femur were examined to investigate the association with the range of stress distribution. BiCONTACT E was set up using two synthetic femurs that mimic the morphology and mechanical properties of living bone.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!