Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
A 26-year-old female patient with a femoral shaft fracture underwent retrograde femoral nailing. Nail removal was performed 2 years later, after fracture healing. An intraoperative fracture of the medial condyle of the femur occurred. This complication has not been previously described in the literature. Screw osteosynthesis of the fracture was performed and articular congruence reestablished. After 6 weeks of fractional weight bearing, the patient proceeded up to full weight bearing without complication. The case demonstrates that the removal of retrograde femoral nails is not without complications. The decision to undertake implant removal should be made carefully.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00113-004-0760-8 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!