A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Sequence assessment of comigrating AFLPTM bands in Echinacea -- implications for comparative biological studies. | LitMetric

The extent of sequence identity among clones derived from monomorphic and polymorphic AFLPTM polymorphism bands was quantified. A total of 79 fragments from a monomorphic band of 273 bp and 48 fragments from a polymorphic band of 159 bp, isolated from individuals belonging to different populations, varieties, and species of Echinacea, were cloned and sequenced. The monomorphic fragments exhibited above 90% sequence identity among clones within samples. Sequence identity within variety ranged from 82.78% to 94.87% and within species from 75.82% to 98.9% and was 57.97% in the genus. The polymorphic fragments exhibited much less sequence identity. In some instances, even two clones from the same fragment were different in their size and sequence. Within sample, clone sequence identity ranged from 100% to 51.57%, within variety from 33.33% to 100% in one variety, and from 23.66% to 45% within species and was as low as 1.25% within the genus. In addition, sequences of the same size were aligned to verify the nature of their sequence dissimilarity/similarity. Within each size group, identical sequences were found across species and varieties. In general, comigrating bands cannot be considered homologous. Thus, the use of AFLPTM band data for comparative studies is appropriate only if the results emanating from such analyses are considered as approximations and are interpreted as phenotypic but not genotypic.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/g03-094DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sequence identity
20
sequence
8
identity clones
8
fragments exhibited
8
identity
5
sequence assessment
4
assessment comigrating
4
comigrating aflptm
4
aflptm bands
4
bands echinacea
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!