Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The nature of the association between language and stuttering in young children has been the focus of debate for many years. One aspect of this ongoing discussion is the status of language abilities in children who stutter (CWS). Available research findings and associated interpretations of these findings are equivocal. This article asserts that an important contributor to the ambiguous nature of this literature may be differences in research traditions and methods that typically have been employed n the study of language development and in the study of stuttering. Cross-disciplinary investigations are inherently complex and, in designing and intterpreting research of this nature, a larger set of issues must be considered and more diverse variables must be aressed and/or controlled. This article presents five prinples that can be used to guide future research in the area language and stuttering. These principles also assist in interpreting and applyng the current research literature to clinical concerns.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2004/009) | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!