A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Evaluation of Vitek system for susceptibility testing of Enterococcus faecium isolates. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Imipenem may not be a first-line treatment for enterococcal infections, but it could be useful for mixed infections involving enterococci, despite a lack of standard testing guidelines.
  • A study at Kangnam St. Mary's Hospital analyzed 52 Enterococcus faecium isolates, with sources primarily from urine and wounds, revealing data on testing errors for various antibiotics.
  • The Vitek system showed reliable results for ampicillin and penicillin but had high error rates for imipenem, necessitating retesting with the agar dilution method when results for imipenem conflict with ampicillin and penicillin.

Article Abstract

Although imipenem is not a first-line drug for treating enterococcal infection, it could well become a useful drug for treating mixed infections that include enterococci. However, there is no NCCLS guideline for susceptibility testing of imipenem versus enterococci. Moreover, there are no statements to indicate that in vitro susceptibility results for other antimicrobial agents can be used to predict the in vitro activity of imipenem against enterococci. In this study, 52 Enterococcus faecium isolates were collected from patients hospitalized at Kangnam St. Mary's Hospital between March 2002 and December 2002. The sources of the isolates were mainly urine specimens and wounds. For ampicillin, the "major" and "very major" error rates observed with the Vitek system were 0% and 2.0%, respectively. For penicillin, the major and very major error rates observed with the Vitek system were both 0%. For imipenem, the major and very major error rates observed with the Vitek system were 0% and 36.5%, respectively. The MICs of ampicillin and penicillin obtained using the Vitek system were reliable, but that of imipenem was unreliable. In the 52 E. faecium isolates, the in vitro activity of penicillin and ampicillin versus enterococci accurately predicted that of imipenem. Therefore, the MIC of imipenem obtained with the Vitek system must be retested by the agar dilution method, when it disagrees with those of penicillin and ampicillin.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

vitek system
24
faecium isolates
12
error rates
12
rates observed
12
observed vitek
12
susceptibility testing
8
enterococcus faecium
8
drug treating
8
versus enterococci
8
vitro activity
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!