Objective: To assess the efficacy and the tolerability of flutamide as adjuvant treatment after radical prostatectomy for locally advanced, lymph node-negative prostate cancer.

Methods: Men with locally advanced, lymph node-negative prostate cancer were randomized after radical prostatectomy to receive either flutamide 750mg daily or no adjuvant treatment. Recurrence-free and overall survival were the study end points. Recurrence was defined as a PSA value greater than 5ng/ml or two values greater than 2ng/ml more than three months apart with increasing tendency or three values greater than 1ng/ml more than three months apart with increasing tendency or any clinical recurrence.

Results: 309 patients (157 in the control arm and 152 in the flutamide arm) were eligible for efficacy analysis. The median follow-up was 6.1 years. Recurrence-free survival was better in the flutamide group ( P=0.0041), there was, however, no detectable difference in overall survival ( p=0.92 ). Moreover, there was a considerable toxicity reported in the flutamide group.

Conclusion: Although having some effect on disease recurrence, adjuvant flutamide treatment does not improve median-term overall survival after radical prostatectomy for locally advanced, lymph node-negative prostate cancer.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2003.10.013DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

radical prostatectomy
16
locally advanced
16
advanced lymph
16
lymph node-negative
16
node-negative prostate
16
adjuvant treatment
12
prostatectomy locally
12
prostate cancer
12
flutamide adjuvant
8
recurrence-free survival
8

Similar Publications

Initial experience of a novel surgical assist robot "Saroa" featuring tactile feedback and a roll-clutch system in radical prostatectomy.

Sci Rep

December 2024

Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Kashiwa Hospital, Kashiwashita 163-1, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8567, Japan.

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Saroa Surgical Robot System in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP). We enrolled 60 patients who underwent RARP using either the Saroa (n = 9) or da Vinci Xi (n = 51) systems at Jikei University Kashiwa Hospital from January 2022 to March 2024. We compared preoperative characteristics, perioperative outcomes, complications, and postoperative urinary continence at three months between the two groups.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: To assess the clinical utility of PCA3 in the diagnostic accuracy, the correlation between PCA3 and biopsy or pathological characteristics and the performance of PCA3 to reduce the unnecessary biopsies in Chinese population.

Methods: A prospective study including patients with indication of prostate biopsies from 4 centers was conducted. All patients underwent PCA3 urine tests and prostate biopsies.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: We investigated whether combining T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings and clinical risk categories improves upon established prognostic indicators of oncological outcomes in prostate cancer.

Methods: Patients who underwent radical prostatectomy, but not preoperative hormone therapy, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy, for localized prostate cancer at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital from October 2007 to April 2016 were included. MRIs were classified according to the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Restoration of postoperative urinary continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is affected by diverse factors. We compared the pad-free and positive margin rates of patients who underwent RARP with or without bladder neck sparing (BNS) for prostate cancer. During this systematic review and metaanalysis, we performed an electronic search of the Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PubMed to find original articles comparing RARP with and without BNS for prostate cancer.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background/aim: This study aims to compare the success rates of rigid registration (RR) and elastic registration (ER) systems in diagnosing all cancers and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC) in software-based targeted prostate biopsies (TPBs) by performing matching analysis.

Materials And Methods: The data of 2061 patients from six centers where software-based TPB is performed were used. All cancer and csPC detection rates of the RR and ER systems were compared following Mahalanobis distance matching with the propensity score caliper method.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!